If cell phones are allowed to be unlocked, the technology of the republic is working

Obama at the White House

Since the establishment of We the People, the US government site dedicated to allowing citizens to petition the government to respond to their concerns, the concept has been engulfed by follies, giggles, and sour grapes. It has not been effective in getting any real changes made in government and at times it has been more of a comical retreat as well as a platform where the opinions of the White House can be spread through “replies” that were already a part of public record. Today, we saw something different, something better. Today, the system might actually have worked as promised.

A petition titled “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” took in 114K digital signatures, prompting a response from the White House. Those who signed the petition weren’t disappointed as the administration, the FCC (.pdf), and the Library of Congress all replied. The White House’s response was extremely supportive, the LOC’s response was pointing out that technically they were in the right even if they were wrong, and the FCC said they agreed that it needed to be looked at more closely. Not bad for a citizen action.

The petition asked for it to be made legal for people who had purchased a phone and completed their contract to unlock it for use with other providers. This would make innovations, consumer freedoms, and reselling of the purchased product easier, the petition argued. The White House agreed across the board.

Now, if this actually turns into reality, it will be the first true action based upon a petition on the site. It will represent a shift towards the digital age that the rest of the country has been in for a while but that Washington DC has avoided. It will mark a path through which technology within this republic can actually flourish and make an impact. Some would argue that this was inevitable, that traditional channels would have yielded the same results or that the administration was leaning in this direction all along. It doesn’t matter. This is technology working on behalf of the people regarding action by the government. It’s significant.

According to the White House’s response:

“The Obama Administration would support a range of approaches to addressing this issue, including narrow legislative fixes in the telecommunications space that make it clear: neither criminal law nor technological locks should prevent consumers from switching carriers when they are no longer bound by a service agreement or other obligation.”

The site has, in the past, been used as an additional sounding board for the administration. They have been light on making a substantial statement about anything that did not align with their own stated goals. For example, there was no need for a petition about reducing gun violence. The administration has been saying the same thing for a while. They’ve also used the site to throw some humor and fun into the mix such as with their response about building a Death Star from Star Wars.

If the current laws are changed and cell phones are allowed to be unlocked, the site will have finally done its job. It will have taken a concern from the citizens, responded to it, and acted on the response. We’ll wait and see if it happens, but this shows a potential for a good day in technology for the republic.

Written by Lorie Wimble

Lorie is the "Liberal Voice" of Conservative Haven, a political blog, and has 2 astounding children. Find her on Google+ and Twitter.
SEE MORE ARTICLES BY "Lorie Wimble"

Related posts
Comments
  • Fiona Marissa

    Thanks for the update on the status of unlocking phones. Until the recent involvement of the LOC, I understood the unlocking of cell phones was a civil matter between the user and the carrier in that it was a violation of the terms of the contract and not a criminal matter. When the LOC’s position became public news, I was following the issue more closely. I travel internationally and was annoyed by the inconvenience that I couldn’t use my cell phone overseas (at least not without incurring a HUGE cell phone bill). I need my phone to be unlocked so I can use foreign SIM cards and local providers and not because I’m trying to cheat my cell phone provider of their US share of my consumer $$. Even though within the past 12 months AT&T has, on their own, lifted their ban on the unlocking of phones out of contract, I’ll still be watching the final outcome closely. It may mean AT&T will be open to unlocking phones for international travel at some point in the near future as well.

    And THANKS for injecting humor in my day! I followed your link to the White House’s response to the Death Star petition. What a hoot! It’s great to see people in public positions still have a sense of humor–and use it! lol!!

    Thanks!