in ,

The iWatch has reportedly been delayed due to a plethora of issues

The iWatch might be on its way, but at least one analyst believes it will arrive later than expected. Apple’s proprietary foray into the wearables sector may not come as quickly as we originally thought, but is still expected to arrive by the end of the year. Why the delay? Apple may be trying to do too much with their wearable. Information from KGI analyst Ming-Chi Kuo notes issues in just about every part of the process. Hardware, software, you name it, Apple is having problems. The screen, which some believe will be AMOLED to help control battery life, is said to be covered in Sapphire glass. According to the analyst, the implementation of Sapphire glass is giving Apple fits.

Apple’s long-rumored iWatch may have hit a rough patch which could push production back a few months. In a recent research note, renowned KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo revised a previous estimate on production of the smartwatch citing complex hardware and software engineering. As a result of delay, Kuo also lowered his company’s forecast of iWatch shipments by 40 percent to three million units this year. The analyst also provided some information as it relates to what he expects to see when the fabled device is finally unveiled. For starters, Kuo expects to see Apple use a flexible AMOLED display which would allow the screen to take on a curved shape not unlike what we’ve already seen from smartphones like the LG Flex or the Samsung Galaxy Round. As we’re likely to see on the iPhone 6, Kuo also believes the iWatch will ship with a sapphire crystal display cover. The wearable may additionally arrive with higher waterproof standards than we’ve seen on other mobile devices and even a new set of system-on-chip components. The latter certainly seems plausible for a number of different reasons. Sure, Apple could simply transplant the A7 into the device but such a move might not make much sense. Will the iWatch need that much processing power or would it be overkill and a detriment to battery life? Would it physically fit inside the watch alongside the other components, sensors and battery that Apple wants to include?

What do you think?

Avatar of Jesseb Shiloh

Written by Jesseb Shiloh

Jesseb Shiloh is new to blogging. He enjoys things that most don't and dismisses society as an unfortunate distraction. Find him on WeHeartWorld, Twitter, Facebook, and Pinterest.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Microsoft has acquired InMage to improve its disaster recovery solutions

This Twitter account alerts you whenever Congress edits Wikipedia