Google, Motorola, HTC, and Samsung have beat Gemalto in a patent lawsuit

TECHi's Author Rocco Penn
Opposing Author Reuters Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Rocco Penn
Rocco Penn
  • Words 120
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Android devices running Java applications do not infringe on patents belonging to SIM card maker Gemalto, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled. Gemalto sued Google, Motorola, HTC and Samsung Electronics in 2010 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging that the companies infringed on three of its patents when running Java applications on their Android phones. Before Gemalto’s invention, personal computers with microprocessors could run Java applications, but these computers required a substantial amount of memory which was located on chips separate from the processor chip, called off-chip memory. Gemalto’s technology enabled devices with less memory to run applications written in high level programming languages such as Java.

Reuters

Reuters

  • Words 200
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

Gemalto NV, the French digital security company, said on Friday that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rejected its patent claim relating to the Android smart phone operating platform. Gemalto, which makes smart cards, filed a suit in the United States in October 2010 against Google, Motorola, Samsung and HTC, alleging that their Android applications infringed on its patents. The company’s shares, which are traded in Amsterdam, fell 1.8 percent early on Friday. “Gemalto’s has consistently patented and broadly licensed its innovation so we are certainly disappointed by this judgment with regards to the scope of use of some of our intellectual property,” Olivier Piou, the company’s chief executive, said in a statement. Piou said the decision would have “no impact on our historical patents licensing activity, nor on the company’s 2017 long-term objectives.” A company spokeswoman could not immediately be reached for comment. Analysts at ING said the court’s rejection was disappointing. “We had estimated that if Gemalto had won the case the company could have been entitled to either a one-off payment in damages, or higher royalty receipts that could amount to 30-50 million euros per annum,” they said in a note.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Reuters

Pentagon to Add Alibaba Baidu BYD to China Military List Impact on Business and Markets
Pentagon to Add Alibaba Baidu BYD to China Military List Impact on Business and Markets

The Pentagon plans to add Alibaba, Baidu, and BYD to its list of Chinese companies linked to the military.  This…

Nvidia Fights Back Against Critics on $4.5 Trillion Valuation
Nvidia Fights Back Against Critics on $4.5 Trillion Valuation

Nvidia is pushing hard against doubters like Michael Burry, the Big Short star, who question its sky-high value.  The company…

FAA Probes Amazon After Prime Air Drone Cuts Internet Cable in Texas
FAA Probes Amazon After Prime Air Drone Cuts Internet Cable in Texas

Amazon is currently under investigation by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) following an incident where one of its delivery…

Starlink’s Direct-to-cell Service Launches in Ukraine in European First
Starlink’s Direct-to-cell Service Launches in Ukraine in European First

The launch of Starlink’s direct-to-cell service in Ukraine indicates a moment when technology goes beyond mere convenience, it becomes a…