Apple and Samsung have agreed to drop appeals in the ITC patent dispute

TECHi's Author Carl Durrek
Opposing Author Appleinsider Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Carl Durrek
Carl Durrek
  • Words 125
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Apple and Samsung agreed to drop their appeals of a patent-infringement case at the US International Trade Commissionthat resulted in an import ban on some older Samsung phones. The import ban will remain in effect, according to a filing with the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington dated Friday. Details were not provided, and Adam Yates, a spokesman for Samsung, and Kristin Huguet, an Apple spokeswoman, declined to say whether the companies had reached an agreement. Samsung had been seeking to overturn the ban, while Apple was trying to revive other patent claims it lost. The focus now turns to Samsung’s efforts to reverse two jury verdicts it lost and Apple’s bid to halt sales of newer Samsung products.

Appleinsider

Appleinsider

  • Words 177
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

In a pair of filings with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit earlier this week, both Apple and Samsung dropped their respective appeals of an ITC order to block sales of certain Samsung products, agreeing further pursuit on the issue would be unfruitful. News of the agreement first came from a Samsung motion on Thursday to voluntarily dismiss its appeal of the ITC ruling from August 2013 that found the company’s products in infringement of two Apple patents. As noted by FOSS Patents’ Florian Mueller, who its own motion corroborating Samsung’s statements. Apple said that Samsung’s motion to drop its appeal means the Commission’s exclusion and cease-and-desist orders are still in effect, but the Korean company’s workarounds of the two patents in question have already nullified any commercial gain from the ruling. Samsung’s CAFC appeal sought to reverse the ITC import ban, while Apple’s appeal looked to reverse decisions that allowed Samsung to create workarounds to its patented technology and possibly broaden the scope of the embargo.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Apple Insider

Apple Robotics Is Set to Become Its Next Major Revenue Stream
Apple Robotics Is Set to Become Its Next Major Revenue Stream

Analysts from Morgan Stanley foresee Apple diving into robotics as its next big business, predicting this sector could generate about…

Spotify is accusing Apple of using its power to hinder its competition
Spotify is accusing Apple of using its power to hinder its competition

The problem with Apple releasing its own music-streaming service is that it now has to compete with existing services like Spotify…

The government’s legal war with the tech industry is far from over
The government’s legal war with the tech industry is far from over

The legal war between the government and the tech industry has quieted down in the weeks since the highly-publicized battle…

Future iPhones might have a glass casing instead of an aluminum one
Future iPhones might have a glass casing instead of an aluminum one

Apple is nothing if not a trend-setter, which makes it difficult for the company to continuously differentiate its products from the…