About 9.3% of Twitter’s content is just spam

TECHi's Author Brian Molidor
Opposing Author Fastcompany Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published April 2, 2015 · 1:20 PM EDT
Fastcompany View all Fastcompany Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published April 2, 2015 Updated January 30, 2024
TECHi's Take
Brian Molidor
Brian Molidor
  • Words 75
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Where there’s social media, there’s spam. That’s a simple fact of the Internet. Just as companies turn to websites like Facebook and Twitter to learn more about their customers, how their customers see them, and promote themselves, some sketchier groups hijack the names of those companies, as well as celebrity names, to lure unsuspecting users. Twitter is one of the worst places for this too, with spam accounting for 9.3% of its content. 

Fastcompany

Fastcompany

  • Words 192
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

It’s no secret that huge brands use Twitter as the world’s biggest focus group. Companies keep their ears pressed up against the wall via social media, determined to suss out what their customers think of them. It’s also no secret that social media data is full of “noise”—messy, useless, irrelevant data. Now, a new study finds that much of that “noise” is generated by links to coupon sites and celebrity retweets. Networked Insights, a Chicago-based analytics firm, recently released a report claiming many of the world’s best-known brands are primarily mentioned on Twitter, Facebook, and other social media platforms in the form of spam, coupons, or adult content—essentially, their brands are hijacked to lure unsuspecting users to click through to unrelated material. According to Networked Insights’ research, 95% of the mentions of Rite Aid on social media are spam messages, as are mentions of Elizabeth Arden. Visa has an impressive 81% spam rate, as does rival MasterCard, with 76%. Seventy percent of mentions of Fisher-Price toys on social media are spam, while 68% of the mentions of cosmetics firm Lancome have nothing to do with consumers actually discussing the cosmetics.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Fastcompany

Snapchat is almost as popular of a video platform as Facebook
Snapchat is almost as popular of a video platform as Facebook

People have been talking about how Facebook is close to becoming the first serious competitor that YouTube has seen in a…

Samsung wants its smartwatches to identify you using your veins
Samsung wants its smartwatches to identify you using your veins

Soon you won't even need to do anything to have your smartwatch identify you if a recently published Samsung patent…

America and Europe have reached a new Safe Harbor agreement
America and Europe have reached a new Safe Harbor agreement

Last October, the European Court of Justice ruled that the Safe Harbor laws that allowed companies to transfer user data between the…

Nielsen now factors social media shares into television ratings
Nielsen now factors social media shares into television ratings

Nielsen announced on Wednesday that it's expanding Twitter TV Ratings to include Facebook as well, and is renaming it to Social Content…