Apple has turned the FTC’s eye towards Google over in-app purchases

TECHi's Author Alfie Joshua
Opposing Author Arstechnica Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published July 10, 2014 · 12:20 AM EDT
Arstechnica View all Arstechnica Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published July 10, 2014 Updated July 9, 2014
TECHi's Take
Alfie Joshua
Alfie Joshua
  • Words 181
  • Estimated Read 1 min

It wasn’t too long ago that Apple landed themselves in a spot of trouble over in-app purchases, something which they were quick to correct and even offered refunds to parents whose kids might have gone on a wild spending spree due to the lack of controls in place. Now the iTunes App Store isn’t the only app store that allows in-app purchases. Other app stores, such as the Google Play Store, allows that too, but oddly enough nothing has been brought up against Google yet. However it turns out that Apple could have pointed the Federal Trade Commission Google’s way, according to an email that surfaced recently, which was reportedly sent by Apple’s general counsel, Bruce Sewell. The email was actually sent earlier this year, but the folks at POLITICO managed to get their hands on it through a Freedom of Information Act request. The email was sent from Sewell to FTC Chairwoman, Edith Ramirez, pointing her towards an article that similarly criticized Google for the lack of controls over in-app purchases in their own app store.

Arstechnica

Arstechnica

  • Words 299
  • Estimated Read 2 min
Read Article

In January, Apple agreed to a $32.5 million deal with the Federal Trade Commission over Apple’s handling of in-app purchases. A recent FOIA request from Politico revealed that barely a week after that decision, Apple General Counsel Bruce Sewell tried to throw Google under the bus, writing to FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez and Democratic Commissioner Julie Brill and pointing out Google’s similar behavior. In-app purchases have been a hot issue for consumer protection advocates of late. In Apple’s case specifically, when parents authorized the purchase of an app, Apple allowed a 15-minute window before asking the customer for his or her password again. This allowed kids to rack up sometimes enormous bills without their parents’ knowledge or permission. Although Apple began to make changes to its policy before the FTC action, the trade commission still ruled that Apple had to offer refunds to angry parents, and if those refunds were less than $32.5 million, Apple had to pay the remainder to the FTC. But Apple was hardly the only offender. For a time, Google allowed a 30-minute window for a phone or tablet user to make purchases before asking for the password again. But the company revised its policies in light of the extra FTC attention and updated the Play Store so that users can now require a password entry every time they make a purchase. Google also permits restricted user accounts on tablets so that parents can keep kids from accessing the Play Store entirely. Still, Sewell referred Ramirez and Brill to a Consumer Reports article that “faulted Google for allowing your ‘kid to spend like a drunken sailor’ for 30 minutes after an adult initially entered a password,” Politico wrote. Apple felt that it shouldn’t be the only company to pay for its former business practice.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Arstechnica

Apple won’t be announcing its television service next week after all
Apple won’t be announcing its television service next week after all

Those of you who have been anticipating the announcement of Apple's long-rumored subscription television service should prepare yourselves for disappointment.…

Kyocera is being sued by Microsoft for infringing on Android patents
Kyocera is being sued by Microsoft for infringing on Android patents

Despite being a direct competitor in the mobile market, Microsoft actually owns quite a few Android patents and isn't afraid…

Maybe default encryption for Android wasn’t such a good idea
Maybe default encryption for Android wasn’t such a good idea

While Android has supported disk encryption for a while now, Android 5.0 is the only version that implements it by…

The FCC has approved America’s strongest-ever net neutrality rules
The FCC has approved America’s strongest-ever net neutrality rules

The strongest net neutrality rules that the United States has ever seen were approved by the FCC in a highly-anticipated…