Apple might not have to break the iPhone’s encryption after all

TECHi's Author Brian Molidor
Opposing Author Politico Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Brian Molidor
Brian Molidor
  • Words 92
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Apple’s legal battle with the FBI took a rather unexpected turn on Monday when the Justice Department convinced a federal court to cancel Tuesday’s highly anticipated hearing on whether Apple should be forced to help the FBI break through the iPhone’s encryption. The reason for this is that the Justice Department may have found a way to break through the iPhone’s encryption without Apple’s assistance, and it’s currently testing out whether or not this method works without compromising the data it’s trying to acquire.

Politico

Politico

  • Words 194
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

Citing a new possible way to access a locked iPhone used by a shooter in the San Bernardino terrorist attack, the Justice Department on Monday convinced a federal court to cancel a Tuesday hearing on whether Apple should be forced to help the FBI break into the device. Government lawyers had insisted for months they needed Apple to write special software so the FBI could bypass security features on the iPhone being used by the San Bernardino shooter, Syed Farook, and obtain what could be critical information for their ongoing terrorism investigation. But the Justice Department unexpectedly told the court just hours before a scheduled hearing that it may not need Apple’s assistance after all. “On Sunday, March 20, 2016, an outside party demonstrated to the FBI a possible method for unlocking Farook’s iPhone,” federal prosecutors said in a filing Monday afternoon. “Testing is required to determine whether it is a viable method that will not compromise data on Farook’s iPhone. If the method is viable, it should eliminate the need for the assistance from Apple Inc. (‘Apple’) set forth in the All Writs Act Order in this case.”

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Politico

Can Google benefit from improved Cuban relations?
Can Google benefit from improved Cuban relations?

They don't know for sure at this point if it's even feasible, but Google is exploring the possibility of investing…

Parents are rallying against using Big Data in public schools
Parents are rallying against using Big Data in public schools

Some people aren't excited by the opportunities afforded by big data, even when those benefits include overhauling a troubled public…

Comcast’s political “donations” ensure the Time Warner merger will go through
Comcast’s political “donations” ensure the Time Warner merger will go through

Lots of people hate the idea of letting Comcast and Time Warner Cable merge but don’t expect our esteemed elected…

Former VP Cheney thought terrorists could hack his heart
Former VP Cheney thought terrorists could hack his heart

There's a fine line between having respect for the possibilities available through modern technology and being completely paranoid. Former Vice…