Apple’s new iMac cuts 50% of the performance to save 19% of the cost

TECHi's Author Rocco Penn
Opposing Author Arstechnica Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Rocco Penn
Rocco Penn
  • Words 114
  • Estimated Read 1 min

When Apple launched its new entry-level iMac last month, many were happy with the price, but concerned about the system’s notably less powerful hardware. To save costs and simplify production, Apple is effectively utilizing the same chipset in the $1,099 iMac as it does in the entry-level MacBook Air: a dual-core 1.4GHz i5 CPU with Intel HD 5000 graphics, and users wondered if this relatively low-end mobile platform was sufficient for powering a large 21.5-inch desktop. Early Geekbench scores revealed both good and bad news. The new $1,099 iMac held its own against the more powerful iMac models in single-core performance, as visualized in the chart below, with each iMac model represented by its base price.

Arstechnica

Arstechnica

  • Words 268
  • Estimated Read 2 min
Read Article

Apple’s new $1,099 iMac will undoubtedly be a popular computer. People in the know who want the most computing bang for their buck would be smarter to step up to a higher-end model, but there are plenty of people—casual users, schools, businesses—who just want an iMac that’s “fast enough,” not one that’s “as fast as it could possibly be.” For those people, we obtained one of the new entry-level iMacs so we could evaluate its performance. On paper, it sounds like a big step down—you’re going from a quad-core desktop processor and GPU to a dual-core Ultrabook processor and GPU. This new iMac and the base MacBook Air models in fact use the exact same processor, even though historically there’s been a big performance gap between MacBook Airs and iMacs. In practice, the story is more complicated. Let’s talk about what the new low-end iMac changes, and then we’ll spend some time looking at processor performance. Let’s get this out of the way first: the low-cost iMac is externally identical to the model released in late 2013, which is itself identical to the redesigned model from late 2012. It has the same 21.5-inch, glare-resistant, 1080p IPS display panel and the same port layout (one audio jack, one SD card slot, four USB 3.0 ports, two Thunderbolt ports, and one gigabit Ethernet port). Its other networking features are also unchanged—it’s got a three-stream 802.11ac implementation capable of up to 1.3Gbps connection speeds and Bluetooth 4.0. We’re not even taking new pictures of the thing. There’s nothing new to see.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Arstechnica

Apple won’t be announcing its television service next week after all
Apple won’t be announcing its television service next week after all

Those of you who have been anticipating the announcement of Apple's long-rumored subscription television service should prepare yourselves for disappointment.…

Kyocera is being sued by Microsoft for infringing on Android patents
Kyocera is being sued by Microsoft for infringing on Android patents

Despite being a direct competitor in the mobile market, Microsoft actually owns quite a few Android patents and isn't afraid…

Maybe default encryption for Android wasn’t such a good idea
Maybe default encryption for Android wasn’t such a good idea

While Android has supported disk encryption for a while now, Android 5.0 is the only version that implements it by…

The FCC has approved America’s strongest-ever net neutrality rules
The FCC has approved America’s strongest-ever net neutrality rules

The strongest net neutrality rules that the United States has ever seen were approved by the FCC in a highly-anticipated…