There’s a reason that the Battlefield series has been so popular amongst its fans. They know what to expect. They know it will be extremely hard, much more challenging than Call of Duty. There’s no quick-scoping or C4 lobs. It’s more real. For some, it’s too real.
Two Takes
View TECHi Stance
Battlefield 4 delivers as expected, good and bad
Arstechnica
View all Arstechnica Two Takes by TECHi
Read the original story
Published November 2, 2013
TECHi's Take
I’ve played a lot of DICE’s Battlefield over the years. Admittedly, I wasn’t there from the start. World War II shooters bore me—Hitler’s firearms were totes imba, so if the games are authentic, the Germans get all the good guns, and if they’re balanced, they might as well not be set in World War II—so I never played Battlefield 1942. But I sunk hundreds upon hundreds of hours into Battlefield 2, Battlefield: Bad Company 2, and Battlefield 3.
NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.
Balanced Perspective
TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.
TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.
More Two Takes from Arstechnica
Those of you who have been anticipating the announcement of Apple's long-rumored subscription television service should prepare yourselves for disappointment.…
Despite being a direct competitor in the mobile market, Microsoft actually owns quite a few Android patents and isn't afraid…
While Android has supported disk encryption for a while now, Android 5.0 is the only version that implements it by…
The strongest net neutrality rules that the United States has ever seen were approved by the FCC in a highly-anticipated…