Chrome’s security team considers marking all HTTP pages as insecure

TECHi's Author Michio Hasai
Opposing Author Tomshardware Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Michio Hasai
Michio Hasai
  • Words 79
  • Estimated Read 1 min

The Chromium Project’s security team has kicked off a debate on whether browser will mark all HTTP pages as insecure. “We … propose that user agents (UAs) gradually change their UX to display non-secure origins as affirmatively non-secure,” the team writes in this post. The post says the team’s goal “… is to more clearly display to users that HTTP provides no data security” because ““We all need data communication on the web to be secure (private, authenticated, untampered).”

Tomshardware

Tomshardware

  • Words 195
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

The Chrome browser is generally considered the most secure Web browser, and it also tends to do the best in hacking competitions such as Pwn2Own. This is in part thanks to the solid security architecture of Chrome, and to its security engineers, who keep adopting strong security designs and policies. There’s always a compromise between security and flexibility/freedom to do something. Security is very much about reducing the attack vectors, which generally means reducing the freedom to use some features. Some of those security decisions can go too far sometimes, such as the decision to only allow Chrome extensions to be installed from the Chrome store, when there could have been alternative solutions that are not as restrictive. On Android, users are still allowed to sideload applications, just like Windows and Mac OS users can still install applications from outside the main store. This feature remains despite Android having a much bigger market share than Chrome, and with sideloaded Android apps being potentially much more damaging than Chrome extensions. Yet the security people in charge of Android have decided it’s a necessary freedom that needs to stay within the Android ecosystem.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Tomshardware

AMD has unveiled its new Radeon R9 285 graphics card
AMD has unveiled its new Radeon R9 285 graphics card

During its 30 Years of Gaming and Graphics event on Saturday, AMD announced the Radeon R9 285, the newest addition…

NVIDIA’s “Mocha” tablet might actually be a part of its Shield lineup
NVIDIA’s “Mocha” tablet might actually be a part of its Shield lineup

Just the other day we heard that NVIDIA could be working on a new tablet codenamed “Mocha”. Given that NVIDIA already…

SteamOS receives support for both Intel and AMD
SteamOS receives support for both Intel and AMD

For those of you who are rocking on to both AMD and Intel customers, it does not really matter as…

Galaxy S4 failure may accelerate S5 release
Galaxy S4 failure may accelerate S5 release

This was the first real setback for the Galaxy line by Samsung. The S4 simply didn't sell very well. This…