Computer scientists come to Samsung’s aid in patent trial

TECHi's Author Rocco Penn
Opposing Author Appleinsider Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Rocco Penn
Rocco Penn
  • Words 85
  • Estimated Read 1 min

In the ongoing Apple v. Samsung patent trial on Tuesday, Samsung continued its defense against by calling on a cavalcade of computer science experts who testified that Apple’s patents were not novel, should not have been granted or did not apply to alleged infringing products. Samsung’s day in court was filled with highly technical testimony as counsel used the time to bolster a defense that Apple’s five patents-in-suit are not colorably different from prior art, irrelevant and not worth $2.19 billion in damages.

Appleinsider

Appleinsider

  • Words 155
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

Samsung didn’t infringe on Apple’s patents for quick links, universal search, slide-to-unlock, and autocorrect, several expert witnesses hired by the Korean giant testified Tuesday. Kevin Jeffay, professor of computer science at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, said that Apple’s ‘647 quick-links patent is more limited than the company claims. The technology allows for the automatic detection of data that can be clicked, such as a phone number being sent to a dialer rather than having to memorize or copy and past the number. Apple’s patent involves the use of an “analyzer server” to perform the action. Samsung devices, however, don’t use an analyzer server for the browser and message, Jeffay said, and detecting and linking in Samsung devices are performed by the application itself. In addition, the Android Jelly Bean browser doesn’t enable selection of detected text, he said. “In my opinion, they do not infringe,” Jeffay said.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Apple Insider

Apple Robotics Is Set to Become Its Next Major Revenue Stream
Apple Robotics Is Set to Become Its Next Major Revenue Stream

Analysts from Morgan Stanley foresee Apple diving into robotics as its next big business, predicting this sector could generate about…

Spotify is accusing Apple of using its power to hinder its competition
Spotify is accusing Apple of using its power to hinder its competition

The problem with Apple releasing its own music-streaming service is that it now has to compete with existing services like Spotify…

The government’s legal war with the tech industry is far from over
The government’s legal war with the tech industry is far from over

The legal war between the government and the tech industry has quieted down in the weeks since the highly-publicized battle…

Future iPhones might have a glass casing instead of an aluminum one
Future iPhones might have a glass casing instead of an aluminum one

Apple is nothing if not a trend-setter, which makes it difficult for the company to continuously differentiate its products from the…