Europe just dealt a massive blow to American technology companies

TECHi's Author Lorie Wimble
Opposing Author Theregister Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published October 6, 2015 · 6:20 AM EDT
Theregister View all Theregister Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published October 6, 2015 Updated January 30, 2024
TECHi's Take
Lorie Wimble
Lorie Wimble
  • Words 112
  • Estimated Read 1 min

The controversial “Safe Harbor” laws that allowed technology companies to move user data between the Europe Union and the United States were ruled invalid by the European Court of Justice this morning. These laws made it so that companies like Facebook and Google could transfer user data from one data center to another if they could guarantee that the data would receive an “adequate level” of protection. By declaring those laws invalid, the European Union has dealt a major blow to American technology companies, as it’s likely they’ll now be forced to keep European user data within the European Union itself, which will require them to expand their European operations. 

Theregister

Theregister

  • Words 201
  • Estimated Read 2 min
Read Article

In a landmark ruling that will have far-reaching repercussions, Europe’s highest court has ruled that data sharing between the EU and US under the Safe Harbour framework is invalid. The decision in the Max Schrems case on Tuesday morning has been anticipated for months, but now legal eagles will have to work out how to manage the situation. Safe Harbour is a fig-leaf agreement set up 16 years ago to create a way for US businesses to transfer EU citizens’ personal data to the US even though American data protection laws are not up to the European standard. Following the revelations by rogue sysadmin Edward Snowden that US businesses were being compelled to hand over personal data under the Prism programme, Austrian law student Schrems complained to the Irish data protection commissioner – Facebook’s EU operations are head-quartered in Ireland – that his privacy rights were being violated. The Irish data protection authority (DPA) refused to act on the grounds that the social network is signed up to Safe Harbour/Harbor – a voluntary scheme whereby companies promise to protect EU personal data. Undeterred, Schrems took his case to the Irish High Court which referred it to the European Court of Justice (ECJ).

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Theregister

Exploiting cheap labor isn’t why Apple makes its products in China
Exploiting cheap labor isn’t why Apple makes its products in China

We all know the reason why so many technology companies manufacture their consumer electronics in China: labor costs in the…

Hilary Clinton wants Silicon Valley to help combat terrorism
Hilary Clinton wants Silicon Valley to help combat terrorism

Hillary Clinton is far from the only politician taking advantage of the recent attacks in Paris to call for weaker encryption,…

Microsoft has developed its own Linux-based operating system
Microsoft has developed its own Linux-based operating system

Considering Microsoft's history of exclusivity to its own ecosystem, it's still a little weird to see the company releasing products…

Google is helping app developers bypass Apple’s new security feature
Google is helping app developers bypass Apple’s new security feature

Even though Google has made it clear that it supports Apple's concern for privacy and decision to implement more encryption…