Facebook is now wrapped in a massive political bias scandal

TECHi's Author Brian Molidor
Opposing Author Gizmodo Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published May 10, 2016 · 12:20 AM EDT
Gizmodo View all Gizmodo Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published May 10, 2016 Updated January 30, 2024
TECHi's Take
Brian Molidor
Brian Molidor
  • Words 108
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Facebook and Google have become the primary sources of news for a significant chunk of the developed world, which means that both companies are in a position to influence the opinions of millions of people by filtering out news stories that don’t match their agendas, and highlighting the ones that do. That’s a frightening thought, and in Facebook’s case, there’s a chance that it might actually be a reality. At least, that’s what Gizmodo claimed in a report on Sunday, saying that Facebook workers have routinely suppressed conservative news stories and injected anti-conservative news stories in the past, and possibly still do so.

Gizmodo

Gizmodo

  • Words 208
  • Estimated Read 2 min
Read Article

Facebook workers routinely suppressed news stories of interest to conservative readers from the social network’s influential “trending” news section, according to a former journalist who worked on the project. This individual says that workers prevented stories about the right-wing CPAC gathering, Mitt Romney, Rand Paul, and other conservative topics from appearing in the highly-influential section, even though they were organically trending among the site’s users. Several former Facebook “news curators,” as they were known internally, also told Gizmodo that they were instructed to artificially “inject” selected stories into the trending news module, even if they weren’t popular enough to warrant inclusion—or in some cases weren’t trending at all. The former curators, all of whom worked as contractors, also said they were directed not to include news about Facebook itself in the trending module. In other words, Facebook’s news section operates like a traditional newsroom, reflecting the biases of its workers and the institutional imperatives of the corporation. Imposing human editorial values onto the lists of topics an algorithm spits out is by no means a bad thing—but it is in stark contrast to the company’s claims that the trending module simply lists “topics that have recently become popular on Facebook.”

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Gizmodo

This might be the year Netflix finally adds offline playback
This might be the year Netflix finally adds offline playback

Being able to download content to your device so that you can stream it offline is an essential feature for…

Pornhub wants virtual reality porn to be accessible to everyone
Pornhub wants virtual reality porn to be accessible to everyone

I wouldn't go so far as to say that Pornhub is at the forefront of technological advancement, but the website is…

The Java plug-in is finally going to meet its long-awaited demise
The Java plug-in is finally going to meet its long-awaited demise

It's been more than two decades since Oracle decided to start plaguing web browsers with its Java plug-in, but it looks like…

Trump wants to force Apple to manufacture its products in America
Trump wants to force Apple to manufacture its products in America

For someone who touts himself as a paragon of capitalism, Donald Trump seems all too willing to trample on the free market…