Four technology giants are appealing an anti-poaching settlement

TECHi's Author Brian Molidor
Opposing Author Reuters Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Brian Molidor
Brian Molidor
  • Words 119
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Four big tech companies embroiled in a Silicon Valley hiring controversy are appealing a judge’s decision to reject a settlement that would have seen them pay $325 million to settle a class action case brought engineers and other employees. According to Reuters, the companies — Apple, Google, Adobe and Intel — have described U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh’s decision last month as “rigid and formulaic” and suggested that rejecting the deal would serve to waste years of court time. The underlying controversy turns on an alleged conspiracy by some of the tech world’s biggest names, including the late Steve Jobs of Apple and Sergey Brin of Google, in which their companies agreed not to recruit each others’ employees.

Reuters

Reuters

  • Words 215
  • Estimated Read 2 min
Read Article

Four technology companies including Apple and Google blasted a U.S. judge for rejecting a proposed $324.5 million settlement over hiring practices in Silicon Valley and asked an appeals court to intervene, according to a court filing. Plaintiff workers accused Apple, Google, Intel and Adobe in a 2011 lawsuit of conspiring to avoid poaching each other’s employees. Last month U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, California, rejected the proposed class action settlement, saying the amount was too low. In a court filing late on Thursday, the companies asked the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overrule Koh’s decision. Koh “committed clear legal error” and “impermissibly substituted the court’s assessment of the value of the case for that of the parties who have been litigating the case for more than three years,” they wrote. Adobe declined to comment, as did an attorney for the plaintiffs. Representatives for the other three firms could not immediately be reached for comment. Tech employees alleged that the conspiracy limited their job mobility and, as a result, kept a lid on salaries. The case has been closely watched because of the possibility of big damages being awarded and for the opportunity of a glimpse into the world of some of America’s elite tech firms.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Reuters

Pentagon to Add Alibaba Baidu BYD to China Military List Impact on Business and Markets
Pentagon to Add Alibaba Baidu BYD to China Military List Impact on Business and Markets

The Pentagon plans to add Alibaba, Baidu, and BYD to its list of Chinese companies linked to the military.  This…

Nvidia Fights Back Against Critics on $4.5 Trillion Valuation
Nvidia Fights Back Against Critics on $4.5 Trillion Valuation

Nvidia is pushing hard against doubters like Michael Burry, the Big Short star, who question its sky-high value.  The company…

FAA Probes Amazon After Prime Air Drone Cuts Internet Cable in Texas
FAA Probes Amazon After Prime Air Drone Cuts Internet Cable in Texas

Amazon is currently under investigation by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) following an incident where one of its delivery…

Starlink’s Direct-to-cell Service Launches in Ukraine in European First
Starlink’s Direct-to-cell Service Launches in Ukraine in European First

The launch of Starlink’s direct-to-cell service in Ukraine indicates a moment when technology goes beyond mere convenience, it becomes a…