Grooveshark may have just been dealt a fatal legal blow

TECHi's Author Michio Hasai
Opposing Author Nytimes Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Michio Hasai
Michio Hasai
  • Words 85
  • Estimated Read 1 min

A federal judge in New York said late Monday that free music streaming service Grooveshark has infringed on thousands of major label copyrights. The record labels have for years sought ways of taking the groove out of Grooveshark, and they may have finally managed it. Gainesville, Florida-based Grooveshark has long hidden from infringement allegations behind the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which says websites can not be held liable for hosting copyrighted materials as long as they provide copyright holders a mechanism for removing infringing material.

Nytimes

Nytimes

  • Words 155
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

In the music industry’s second big legal victory in a week, a federal judge in New York ruled on Monday that Grooveshark, an online music service long vilified by the major record companies, infringed on thousands of their copyrights. Like Napster, LimeWire, Grokster and other online outlets before it, Grooveshark came under fierce attack from the recording industry for hosting music files without permission. Grooveshark — based in Gainesville, Fla., and identified in court papers by its parent company, Escape Media Group — makes millions of songs available for streaming. Yet despite numerous legal challenges, the service continued operating and building a huge audience in the years before the arrival of Spotify and other streaming outlets, which operate with the permission of record companies and music publishers. By 2011, Grooveshark — which has licenses for some of its music, but not all — claimed to have 35 million users and was attracting advertising from major brands like Mercedes-Benz and Groupon.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Nytimes

Fiat Chrysler and Google are creating a fleet of autonomous minivans
Fiat Chrysler and Google are creating a fleet of autonomous minivans

Fiat Chrysler is lagging behind the rest of the automotive industry when it comes to autonomous vehicle development, and CEO Sergio…

China wants to build floating nuclear power plants for its new islands
China wants to build floating nuclear power plants for its new islands

I'm sure you've heard about that man-made island chain that China has built in the South China Sea, the one…

Many of Apple’s engineers would rather quit than assist the FBI
Many of Apple’s engineers would rather quit than assist the FBI

Apple's leadership stands behind the company's decision to fight against the government's demands to break the iPhone's encryption, and it…

Obama has finally spoken out about the encryption debate
Obama has finally spoken out about the encryption debate

Ever since Apple refused to assist the FBI in breaking through the iPhone's encryption last month, the United States has been…