Here are 232 reasons why you should be grateful for internet ads

TECHi's Author Connor Livingston
Opposing Author Fastcompany Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Connor Livingston
Connor Livingston
  • Words 103
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Online advertising is annoying but the Internet wouldn’t be nearly as great without it. Fast Company directs our attention to a study from UK video ad platform Ebuzzing that claims it would cost each of us around $232 extra per year to get all of the stuff on the web we now enjoy for free if we eliminated online ads. Of course, Ebuzzing’s study is self-serving since the company makes its money primarily from serving online ads. That said, all of the incredible information that we have for free at our fingertips thanks to the web really does seem like a bargain. 

Fastcompany

Fastcompany

  • Words 189
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

We all know that ads are the lifeblood of the Internet. Annoying? Sure. You’d be hard-pressed, though, to find anyone who didn’t understand that they were a necessary evil. But what would happen if we were to somehow–miraculously?–dispense with all the ads? How much would you be willing to pay? One U.K. video ad platform calledEbuzzing conducted an interesting (if intentionally oversimplified) study calculating the average value of each user in a noble attempt to figure out how much it would cost to support an ad-free Internet. Per the Telegraph: “Video ad platform Ebuzzing calculated the average ‘value’ of each web user by dividing the amount of money spent on digital advertising in the UK in 2013 (£6.4 billion) by the number of UK web users (45 million).” Note that the figure is U.K.-only. According to Ebuzzing’s math, though, it would cost £140, or $232.24 per year, for an ad-free Internet. That’s about two months’ worth of a Comcast bill. The company then polled 1,400 U.K. customers, asking if they would be willing to pay that figure for a year of no-ads browsing: 98% said no.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Fastcompany

Snapchat is almost as popular of a video platform as Facebook
Snapchat is almost as popular of a video platform as Facebook

People have been talking about how Facebook is close to becoming the first serious competitor that YouTube has seen in a…

Samsung wants its smartwatches to identify you using your veins
Samsung wants its smartwatches to identify you using your veins

Soon you won't even need to do anything to have your smartwatch identify you if a recently published Samsung patent…

America and Europe have reached a new Safe Harbor agreement
America and Europe have reached a new Safe Harbor agreement

Last October, the European Court of Justice ruled that the Safe Harbor laws that allowed companies to transfer user data between the…

Nielsen now factors social media shares into television ratings
Nielsen now factors social media shares into television ratings

Nielsen announced on Wednesday that it's expanding Twitter TV Ratings to include Facebook as well, and is renaming it to Social Content…