How an American tech company won a $25 million lawsuit with fake emails

TECHi's Author Michio Hasai
Opposing Author Arstechnica Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Michio Hasai
Michio Hasai
  • Words 120
  • Estimated Read 1 min

After winning a verdict of nearly $25 million in a federal trade secrets case earlier this year, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld has filed a motion to withdraw from its representation of LBDS Holding Company, LLC. Noting that it is unusual to do so after a favorable jury verdict and while a motion for judgment is pending, the law firm says in a Wednesday filing in the Eastern District of Texas case that a May 14 sanctions motion filed by the defendant, ISOL Technology, is essentially justified. The sanctions motion contends that “LBDS and its principals manufactured and falsified evidence used in this litigation, testified falsely, and committed a fraud upon this Court,” as the Akin Gump motion describes the allegations.

Arstechnica

Arstechnica

  • Words 199
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

Imagine that you’re a lawyer, a partner at a powerhouse firm in the US, who has just spent the last three years litigating an intellectual property case against a South Korean company in a Texas court. Imagine that you finally plowed through a six-day jury trial involving key e-mails as evidence, then imagine that you won a $25 million payday for your clients. Time to celebrate? Sure, until you find out that your three years of work relied in part on a series of faked e-mails that your own client had purposely created—and that the FBI was investigating. Now imagine how quickly you might want out of the whole matter. The battle of the acronyms began back in August 2011, when LBDS Holding Company sued South Korean company ISOL Technology over magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tech. An MRI can produce incredible interior images of the body, but the technique famously requires the patient to remain still—a problem when trying to image the always-beating human heart. LBDS said it had developed “highly confidential, proprietary technology” to solve the problem, which was to have been incorporated into ISOL MRI machines, imported into the US, and sold under LBDS’ private label.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Arstechnica

Apple won’t be announcing its television service next week after all
Apple won’t be announcing its television service next week after all

Those of you who have been anticipating the announcement of Apple's long-rumored subscription television service should prepare yourselves for disappointment.…

Kyocera is being sued by Microsoft for infringing on Android patents
Kyocera is being sued by Microsoft for infringing on Android patents

Despite being a direct competitor in the mobile market, Microsoft actually owns quite a few Android patents and isn't afraid…

Maybe default encryption for Android wasn’t such a good idea
Maybe default encryption for Android wasn’t such a good idea

While Android has supported disk encryption for a while now, Android 5.0 is the only version that implements it by…

The FCC has approved America’s strongest-ever net neutrality rules
The FCC has approved America’s strongest-ever net neutrality rules

The strongest net neutrality rules that the United States has ever seen were approved by the FCC in a highly-anticipated…