How would mandatory drone registrations affect Americans?

TECHi's Author Carl Durrek
Opposing Author Readwrite Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Carl Durrek
Carl Durrek
  • Words 84
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Commercial drones have been a major problem for federal regulators for a while now, especially since they can’t seem to find an acceptable, yet effective way to go about regulating them. However, the Department of Transportation has started the process of writing up some commercial drones rules that would require the owners of such drones to register them with the federal government, something that has drawn a lot of criticism from the public, who’re worried about the potential consequences of such rules. 

Readwrite

Readwrite

  • Words 228
  • Estimated Read 2 min
Read Article

Federal regulators are eyeing the drone industry. Earlier this week, the U.S. Department of Transportation announced a task force charged with setting the new rules around mandatory registration for some commercial drones. The yet-to-be-determined rules have drone enthusiasts and lobbyists worried about what regulations could do to the nascent industry. Reports indicate that mandatory registration is created primarily so that law enforcement can hunt down operators who cause public safety violations, like recent drone crashes at sporting events or those buzzing dangerously close to commercial airliners. If a drone is recovered at a crash site, a registration number will make it easier to find the culprit. So, what’s to worry about simple registration? I asked experts about the worst-case scenario, to see if all the handwringing was justified. They mentioned several. One of the consensus concerns was overburdening consumers. Make it too cumbersome for a parent to buy their child a flying toy, and they’ll just buy something else. “There is the risk that this a federal registry could be bad for the industry overall by being overly broad, e.g. requiring every kid with a toy drone to be on a federal list,” said Daniel Castro, vice president of industry lobby The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation. “If we make it too hard for users to have these devices, they won’t buy them.”

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Readwrite

Self-driving cars are making their way to racetracks
Self-driving cars are making their way to racetracks

There really is no better place to show off the latest car technology than the racetrack, and there are few technologies as…

Mozilla has given up on Firefox OS-powered smartphones
Mozilla has given up on Firefox OS-powered smartphones

The idea behind Firefox OS was to create a mobile operating system that would focus on being affordable, lightweight, and web standards-compliant.…

Nest Weave could be the protocol that powers your smarthome
Nest Weave could be the protocol that powers your smarthome

Google-owned Nest unveiled its new protocol for Internet of Things devices earlier today, which goes by the name of Weave, which…

Facebook just took its first step towards support virtual reality videos
Facebook just took its first step towards support virtual reality videos

True virtual reality videos are still pretty rare, mainly due to the fact that no major virtual reality headset has…