Microsoft is desperate to avoid returning “to the digital dark ages”

TECHi's Author Chastity Mansfield
Opposing Author Techspot Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published October 21, 2015 · 3:20 PM EDT
Techspot View all Techspot Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published October 21, 2015 Updated January 30, 2024
TECHi's Take
Chastity Mansfield
Chastity Mansfield
  • Words 90
  • Estimated Read 1 min

In case you’ve been living under a rock these past few weeks and aren’t aware, the European Union recently ruled that the Safe Harbor agreement is invalid, which could make it significantly more difficult for technology companies to transfer data between Europe and North America if something isn’t done about it. That’s why Microsoft president and chief legal officer, Brad Smith, has presented his own proposal to replace the system, which he claims will be able to prevent us from returning “to the digital dark ages.”

Techspot

Techspot

  • Words 223
  • Estimated Read 2 min
Read Article

As thousands of companies on two continents worry about the repercussions from the European Court of Justice’s recent ruling that the Safe Harbor agreement is invalid, Microsoft’s president and chief legal officer, Brad Smith, has presented a four-step proposal to replace the system and stop a “return to the digital dark ages.” The trans-Atlantic Safe Harbor agreement, which has governed the flow of personal data across the Atlantic for the last 15 years, was nullified on October 6 after the ECJ said it didn’t offer its citizens adequate privacy protections. The ruling came after an Austrian law student, Max Schrems, questioned the safety of European citizens’ personal information in the wake of allegations of spying by US government agencies. European privacy regulators have said that if a new agreement is not reached, they will start to enforce tougher oversight of data transfers, including issuing fines and banning overseas data transfers, by the end of January. Smith said in a blog post that new technology meant an updated version of Safe Harbor has been necessary for many years: “It’s an opportunity whose time has come. This month the old legal system collapsed, but the foundation long ago had crumbled. In recent years it has been apparent that a new century requires a new privacy framework. It’s time to go build it.”

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Techspot

Samsung Delays $37B Texas Chip Plant With No Customers In Sight
Samsung Delays $37B Texas Chip Plant With No Customers In Sight

There is a fundamental flaw in America's semiconductor strategy. They’re building capacity without securing demand. Samsung's Taylor plant situation reveals…

NVIDIA has announced its newest flagship graphics card
NVIDIA has announced its newest flagship graphics card

NVIDIA announced it's newest flagship graphics card at an event in San Francisco on Friday, and CEO Jen-Hsun Huang claims that…

India has banned Facebook’s controversial Free Basics service
India has banned Facebook’s controversial Free Basics service

Facebook just wants to become the gatekeeper of the Internet for the developing world and exploit impoverished people to increase its…

Study shows that most of your Facebook friends aren’t actual friends
Study shows that most of your Facebook friends aren’t actual friends

How many of your Facebook friends are actually friends, and how many are just acquaintances? According to a study that was…