Most people wouldn’t even pay $200 for a smartwatch

TECHi's Author
Opposing Author Androidauthority Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Alfie Joshua
Alfie Joshua
  • Words 97
  • Estimated Read 1 min

With how much attention the market for wearable gadgets has been getting recently, you’d think it was a lucrative market with tons of people willing to pay hundreds of dollars for the latest fitness trackers or smartwatches, but that’s far from the case. In fact, a recent survey done by Juniper Research found that most smartphone owners in the United Kingdom and United States wouldn’t even pay $200 for a wearable. A mere 20% of the 2,000 people that were surveyed said that any more than $175 (£115) is too much for a wearable device, even a high-end smartwatch.

Androidauthority

Androidauthority

  • Words 203
  • Estimated Read 2 min
Read Article

Are wearables the next big thing for smart products or a high-cost segment being forced into the market in lieu of meaningful innovation? It appears that the latter may be closer to the truth at the moment, as Juniper Research has found that very few consumers are interested in expensive wearable gadgets. From a survey of just over 2,000 smartphone owners in the UK and US, the research found that only 1 in 5 customers are prepared to pay more than $175 (~£115) for any sort of wearable device. This doesn’t bode well for the range of more expensive smartwatches that have hit the market lately, and probably also goes some way to explain the popularity of lower cost sports wearables, such as the FitBit range. However, this trend is somewhat at odds with the research team’s finding about the ‘coolest’ brands. Both Apple and Samsung, which offer the most expensive wearables on the market, topped the rankings, with over 75 percent of respondents stating that they preferred these two brands. Other Android Wear manufacturers make up the top five, while Pebble and a number of sports brands, which feature lower price tags, are dotted lower down the list. Fashion brands didn’t fare too well either.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Androidauthority

Xiaomi is about to launch its first product in the United States
Xiaomi is about to launch its first product in the United States

It'll be a while before Xiaomi launches a smartphone in the United States, assuming it ever does, but that doesn't mean…

Most people stop using apps within three days of downloading them
Most people stop using apps within three days of downloading them

Getting people to download your app is the easy part (relatively speaking), it's getting them to continue using it that's…

Sony is killing off its flagship smartphone series
Sony is killing off its flagship smartphone series

The Xperia Z-series has never been a big sales generator, and considering the laughable state of Sony's mobile business, it's no…

More evidence suggests the Galaxy S7 will be water-resistant
More evidence suggests the Galaxy S7 will be water-resistant

Samsung may have nailed the design aspect of the Galaxy S6, but design alone isn't enough to sell a smartphone,…