Music streaming apps are accusing Apple of anti-competitive policies

TECHi's Author Lorie Wimble
Opposing Author Appleinsider Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published May 6, 2015 · 6:20 PM EDT
Appleinsider View all Appleinsider Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published May 6, 2015 Updated January 30, 2024
TECHi's Take
Lorie Wimble
Lorie Wimble
  • Words 75
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Imagine if your service was competing against a bunch of other services in a crowded but lucrative market. Nothing wrong with competition, right? Now imagine that one of you competitors took a 30% cut of everything you and your other competitors made while still having their own service out there. Is that fair? No, not really. That’s why Spotify and its fellow music streaming services are calling out Apple on its anti-competitive App Store policies. 

Appleinsider

Appleinsider

  • Words 184
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

Spotify and other streaming music services are upset with Apple’s App Store policies, which they say effectively prevent them from competing with iTunes or Beats Music, a report claimed on Wednesday. The issue, according to industry sources for The Verge, is the 30 percent cut Apple takes from all App Store purchases, including in-app transactions. In the case of Spotify, the company has to charge $13 a month for a Premium subscription bought through its iOS app to make the same amount of money it does from a $10 fee elsewhere. App Store rules further prevent apps from linking to external storefronts. More importantly, Apple has been venturing deeper into the streaming world. The company now pulls in revenue from both iTunes Radio and Beats Music, while benefiting from reduced competition on its industry-standard mobile store. Apple is believed to be working on rebranding Beats Music for an on-demand service launching later this year. “They control iOS to give themselves a price advantage,” one of the sources said. “Thirty percent doesn’t go to any artist, it doesn’t go to us, it goes to Apple.”

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Appleinsider

Apple Robotics Is Set to Become Its Next Major Revenue Stream
Apple Robotics Is Set to Become Its Next Major Revenue Stream

Analysts from Morgan Stanley foresee Apple diving into robotics as its next big business, predicting this sector could generate about…

Spotify is accusing Apple of using its power to hinder its competition
Spotify is accusing Apple of using its power to hinder its competition

The problem with Apple releasing its own music-streaming service is that it now has to compete with existing services like Spotify…

The government’s legal war with the tech industry is far from over
The government’s legal war with the tech industry is far from over

The legal war between the government and the tech industry has quieted down in the weeks since the highly-publicized battle…

Future iPhones might have a glass casing instead of an aluminum one
Future iPhones might have a glass casing instead of an aluminum one

Apple is nothing if not a trend-setter, which makes it difficult for the company to continuously differentiate its products from the…