Obama has finally spoken out about the encryption debate

TECHi's Author Connor Livingston
Opposing Author Nytimes Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published March 12, 2016 · 1:20 AM EST
Nytimes View all Nytimes Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published March 12, 2016 Updated January 30, 2024
TECHi's Take
Connor Livingston
Connor Livingston
  • Words 123
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Ever since Apple refused to assist the FBI in breaking through the iPhone’s encryption last month, the United States has been engaged in an unprecedented debate about privacy and security, and numerous high-profile people from both the government and the technology industry have come forward to express their opinions on the matter. One person who has been conspicuously absent from the debate, however, has been President Obama, but he broke his silence in front of a sizable group of SXSW attendees in Austin on Friday. Naturally, he tried to keep his opinion as neutral as possible, saying that both sides of the debate need to be open to compromise, but he definitely seemed to favor the FBI’s position.

Nytimes

Nytimes

  • Words 221
  • Estimated Read 2 min
Read Article

President Obama said Friday that law enforcement must be legally able to collect information from smartphones and other electronic devices, making clear, despite divisions in his administration, that he opposes the stance on encryption taken by technology companies like Apple. Speaking to an audience of about 2,100 technology executives and enthusiasts at the South by Southwest festival here, Mr. Obama delivered his most extensive declarations on an issue that has split the technology community and pitted law enforcement against other national security departments. Mr. Obama declined to comment specifically on the efforts by the F.B.I. to require Apple’s help in gaining data from an iPhone used by one of the terrorists in the December attack in San Bernardino, Calif. But the president said that America had already accepted that law enforcement can “rifle through your underwear” in searches for those suspected of preying on children, and he said there was no reason that a person’s digital information should be treated differently. “If, technologically, it is possible to make an impenetrable device or system, where the encryption is so strong that there is no key, there is no door at all, then how do we apprehend the child pornographer?” Mr. Obama said. “How do we disrupt a terrorist plot?”

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Nytimes

Fiat Chrysler and Google are creating a fleet of autonomous minivans
Fiat Chrysler and Google are creating a fleet of autonomous minivans

Fiat Chrysler is lagging behind the rest of the automotive industry when it comes to autonomous vehicle development, and CEO Sergio…

China wants to build floating nuclear power plants for its new islands
China wants to build floating nuclear power plants for its new islands

I'm sure you've heard about that man-made island chain that China has built in the South China Sea, the one…

Many of Apple’s engineers would rather quit than assist the FBI
Many of Apple’s engineers would rather quit than assist the FBI

Apple's leadership stands behind the company's decision to fight against the government's demands to break the iPhone's encryption, and it…

The government won’t be able to crack the next-generation iPhones
The government won’t be able to crack the next-generation iPhones

Apple's face-off with the FBI has proven that the government is willing to use legal force to make companies weaken…