Richard Stallman: Android and Windows are just malware in disguise

TECHi's Author Michio Hasai
Opposing Author Theguardian Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published May 26, 2015 · 8:20 AM EDT
Theguardian View all Theguardian Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published May 26, 2015 Updated January 30, 2024
TECHi's Take
Michio Hasai
Michio Hasai
  • Words 98
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Richard Stallman wasn’t just instrumental in the creation of Linux, he’s the founder of the free software movement that has been trying to turn people away from proprietary software for decades. According to an opinion piece he wrote for the Guardian, if software isn’t distributed free of charge then it’s malware, plain and simple. He claims that operating systems like Android, iOS, Windows, and many more were designed to spy on them and lock them down with DRM. He’s an interesting person with interesting points, and this piece is certainly worth the read. 

Theguardian

Theguardian

  • Words 201
  • Estimated Read 2 min
Read Article

In 1983, when I started the free software movement, malware was so rare that each case was shocking and scandalous. Now it’s normal. To be sure, I am not talking about viruses. Malware is the name for a program designed to mistreat its users. Viruses typically are malicious, but software products and software preinstalled in products can also be malicious – and often are, when not free/libre. In 1983, the software field had become dominated by proprietary (ie nonfree) programs, and users were forbidden to change or redistribute them. I developed the GNU operating system, which is often called Linux, to escape and end that injustice. But proprietary developers in the 1980s still had some ethical standards: they sincerely tried to make programs serve their users, even while denying users control over how they would be served. How far things have sunk. Developers today shamelessly mistreat users; when caught, they claim that fine print in EULAs (end user licence agreements) makes it ethical. (That might, at most, make it lawful, which is different.) So many cases of proprietary malware have been reported, that we must consider any proprietary program suspect and dangerous. In the 21st century, proprietary software is computing for suckers.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Theguardian

Spotify collaborates with global music giants to create ethical AI technologies
Spotify collaborates with global music giants to create ethical AI technologies

Spotify is forging a significant collaboration with the major players in the global music industry, Sony, Universal, and Warner, to…

Donkey Kong Comeback Smashes Expectations
Donkey Kong Comeback Smashes Expectations

Donkey Kong Bananza signifies one thrilling transformation on the part of Nintendo and veterans. It is a new release after…

Trump Administration Reportedly Plans to Cut 2,145 NASA Employees
Trump Administration Reportedly Plans to Cut 2,145 NASA Employees

The news that the Trump administration wishes to reduce the number of NASA workers by over two thousand is a…

Google Ordered to Pay $314.6M to Android Users
Google Ordered to Pay $314.6M to Android Users

This is actually a pretty big revelation. Google wasn't just spying on users, it was making them pay for the…