SoundCloud wants to make cash off copyright-infringing remixes

TECHi's Author Chastity Mansfield
Opposing Author Digitaltrends Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published April 10, 2015 · 3:20 PM EDT
Digitaltrends View all Digitaltrends Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published April 10, 2015 Updated January 30, 2024
TECHi's Take
Chastity Mansfield
Chastity Mansfield
  • Words 65
  • Estimated Read 1 min

So you’ve managed to build a music-centric service that’s incredibly popular among professionals, from DJs to musicians, but where do you go from there? How do you monetize? This is the problem that SoundCloud is having, but it may have a solution. By partnering with ZEFR, the company wants to turn all of the copyright-infringing remixes on the service into sources of revenue. 

Digitaltrends

Digitaltrends

  • Words 160
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

SoundCloud is a big name among musicians, DJs, podcasters, and more, but the Berlin-based company has seemed uncertain about how to go about generating revenue from its user base. Last year SoundCloud inked its first deal with a major record label, and now the company seems to be looking at monetizing copyright-infringing tracks. A partnership between SoundCloud and rights management company ZEFR was announced yesterday, and while the wording was a bit vague, plenty of clues can be gleaned from ZEFR’s existing partnership with YouTube. Two ZEFR products, Content ID and Brand ID, are the brains behind many of the ads and links you see that are related to the video you’re watching. By working with record labels, ZEFR ensures that, even though companies may not get any revenue from the ads on the song you’re watching a copyright-infringing video of, you’ll at least be presented with an easy way to buy the song on iTunes.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Digitaltrends

This app let’s you buy the food that restaurants want to throw away
This app let’s you buy the food that restaurants want to throw away

Just because it's not fresh doesn't mean it's not edible. For people willing to eat food that's old, but not…

Check out the OnePlus smartwatch that will never exist
Check out the OnePlus smartwatch that will never exist

In the two years since OnePlus exploded onto the smartphone scene with the OnePlus One, rumors that the company is working…

Apple’s new patent could put an end to autocorrect mistakes
Apple’s new patent could put an end to autocorrect mistakes

Autocorrect is incredibly useful when it works, but when it doesn't work, it can cause problems that are always annoying, often…

Africa’s first billion-dollar company is an e-commerce network
Africa’s first billion-dollar company is an e-commerce network

With more than a billion people and some of the fastest-growing economies in the world, Africa is on its way to becoming…