Spotify responds to Taylor Swift’s harsh criticism

TECHi's Author Carl Durrek
Opposing Author Washingtonpost Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Carl Durrek
Carl Durrek
  • Words 93
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Last week we learned that pop star Taylor Swift decided to remove all her music from Spotify because she felt that it doesn’t “fairly compensate the writers, producers, artists, and creators of this music” and that she couldn’t “agree with perpetuating the perception that music has no value and should be free.” Now Spotify CEO Daniel Ek has responded to Swift’s criticism by saying that she and other artists should be grateful to the service because otherwise pirates would just steal their music and they wouldn’t make any money.

Washingtonpost

Washingtonpost

  • Words 189
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

Taylor Swift has criticized streaming services like Spotify for not sharing enough of its revenues with musicians. On Tuesday, Spotify chief executive Daniel Ek responded, saying that that streaming service is paying more than $2 billion in royalties. Ek defended the streaming service, calling it the fastest-growing source of new revenues for the music industry. “We started Spotify because we love music and piracy was killing it. So all the talk swirling around lately about how Spotify is making money on the backs of artists upsets me big time,” he wrote in a blog post on Spotify’s site. “Lots of problems that have plagued the industry since its inception continue to exist,” he added. “As I said, we’ve already paid more than $2 billion in royalties to the music industry and if that money is not flowing to the creative community in a timely and transparent way, that’s a big problem.” One reason that musicians don’t see as much money as they could is that music middlemen — namely record labels and publishers – often take a big portion of the royalties paid by streaming services such as Spotify.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Washingtonpost

The FBI paid hackers to unlock the San Bernadino terrorist’s iPhone
The FBI paid hackers to unlock the San Bernadino terrorist’s iPhone

The encryption dispute between Apple and the FBI took a rather unexpected turn a couple of weeks ago when the FBI…

Things might actually be turning around for BlackBerry
Things might actually be turning around for BlackBerry

John Chen may have built a reputation as a guy who can turn things around for struggling companies, but when he…

Google’s self-driving cars may start communicating with pedestrians
Google’s self-driving cars may start communicating with pedestrians

Although self-driving cars are being developed at an impressive pace, there's still a long way to go before they're ready…

Telemarketers will soon have their number published by the FCC
Telemarketers will soon have their number published by the FCC

Most people never bother reporting robocallers and telemarketers to the FCC, although there are still hundreds of people that do…