The Senate is trying to legalize cell phone unlocking again

TECHi's Author Rocco Penn
Opposing Author Arstechnica Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published June 24, 2014 · 9:20 AM EDT
Arstechnica View all Arstechnica Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published June 24, 2014 Updated June 23, 2014
TECHi's Take
Rocco Penn
Rocco Penn
  • Words 112
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee have reached a bipartisan deal on legislation that would allow people to “unlock” their cellphones when changing providers. The bill, which will be considered on Thursday, would allow users to take their mobile device from one wireless network to another, and is backed by Chairman Patrick Leahy and ranking member Sen. Chuck Grassle. “Consumers should be able to use their existing cell phones when they move their service to a new wireless provider,” Leahy said in a statement. “Our laws should not prohibit consumers from carrying their cell phones to a new network, and we should promote and protect competition in the wireless marketplace,” he said.

Arstechnica

Arstechnica

  • Words 212
  • Estimated Read 2 min
Read Article

The leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee have drafted a compromise bill that will allow for the unlocking of cell phones. The “Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act” [PDF] wasintroduced yesterday by Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Charles Grassley (R-IA). Unlocking phones to run on other networks violates the prohibition against “circumventing” copy protection schemes under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. However, from 2006 to 2012, the Library of Congress granted an “exemption” to copyright law that allowed for consumers to unlock their cellphones in order to change providers. They allowed that exemption to expire in 2013, however, and cell phone unlocking went back to being illegal. That spawned a fair bit of activism pushing Congress to change the rule once and for all. A citizen petition insisting that phone unlocking should be legal gained support from the White House and laterfrom the FCC. A bill moved forward in the House of Representatives, but only passed in February after it was watered down, with a section added to ban “bulk” unlocking. In other words, it would have allowed tech-savvy individuals to unlock their phones without fear of actually being prosecuted—but not allowed average Joes and Janes to actually get help in unlocking their own phones. That solution was panned by groups seeking reform.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Arstechnica

Apple won’t be announcing its television service next week after all
Apple won’t be announcing its television service next week after all

Those of you who have been anticipating the announcement of Apple's long-rumored subscription television service should prepare yourselves for disappointment.…

Kyocera is being sued by Microsoft for infringing on Android patents
Kyocera is being sued by Microsoft for infringing on Android patents

Despite being a direct competitor in the mobile market, Microsoft actually owns quite a few Android patents and isn't afraid…

Maybe default encryption for Android wasn’t such a good idea
Maybe default encryption for Android wasn’t such a good idea

While Android has supported disk encryption for a while now, Android 5.0 is the only version that implements it by…

The FCC has approved America’s strongest-ever net neutrality rules
The FCC has approved America’s strongest-ever net neutrality rules

The strongest net neutrality rules that the United States has ever seen were approved by the FCC in a highly-anticipated…