Tor wants to replace government donations with crowdfunding

TECHi's Author Rocco Penn
Opposing Author Theverge Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published November 24, 2015 · 9:20 PM EST
Theverge View all Theverge Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published November 24, 2015 Updated January 30, 2024
TECHi's Take
Rocco Penn
Rocco Penn
  • Words 86
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Considering how the United States government’s feelings towards encryption and online anonymity have been like over the past couple of years, it’s no surprise that the Tor Project wants to seek other sources of funding. Despite being one of the few tools that can consistently combat government surveillance, the Tor Project actually receives 80-90% of its funding from the American government, which is why the organization ha started looking into crowdfunding as a way to find the financial support it needs to continue functioning.  

Theverge

Theverge

  • Words 186
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

Following up on goals set earlier this year, the Tor Project launched its first crowdfunding project today to expand its donor base beyond the US government and allow for spending flexibility. Although there wasn’t much of an explanation in its campaign announcement, Tor could be seeking to become less reliant on the US government, which typically accounts for 80 to 90 percent of annual funding. Tor said in March it was exploring crowdfunding as a way to bring its Hidden Services to the broader internet and, more specifically, countries whose citizens might benefit from added privacy. The technology allows users to connect to blogs and chats, among other online services, while remaining anonymous. Despite receiving significant public funding, Tor’s relationship with the US government overall is complicated. Tor’s creators claimed earlier this month that the FBI paid Carnegie Mellon University researchers $1 million to de-anonymize its browser, the results of which were discovered in July 2014. The university later followed up with a statement that didn’t completely absolve it of any wrongdoing. Instead, it hinted at its researchers producing the work for free under a subpoena.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Theverge

Why Microsoft Windows 11 Copilot AI Falls Short of Expectations?
Why Microsoft Windows 11 Copilot AI Falls Short of Expectations?

Microsoft's Copilot AI in Windows 11 falls short of user expectations, especially when compared to the company’s high-profile advertisements.  Real-world…

Apple’s Switch to OLED Displays Could Make the iPad Mini More Expensive
Apple’s Switch to OLED Displays Could Make the iPad Mini More Expensive

Apple's idea to use OLED screens for gadgets shows how keen they are to boost how things look and feel.…

Pixel Watch 4: Sleeker design, new fitness tools, and smarter AI
Pixel Watch 4: Sleeker design, new fitness tools, and smarter AI

The Pixel Watch 4 is a new milestone in the world of smartwatches offered by Google. It brings several firsts,…

Apple Unintentionally Revealed Details About Some of Its Upcoming Chip Upgrades
Apple Unintentionally Revealed Details About Some of Its Upcoming Chip Upgrades

This most recent leak of Apple has got everybody talking in the tech world. The emerging code suggests substantial updates…