White House cybersecurity leader admits to lacking technical knowledge

TECHi's Author Connor Livingston
Opposing Author Gizmodo Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Connor Livingston
Connor Livingston
  • Words 109
  • Estimated Read 1 min

One might reasonably expect the White House’s cybersecurity coordinator to know a thing or two about IT. But according to Michael Daniel, his lack of technical expertise actually gives him an advantage over someone with higher technical qualifications. In a recent interview with GovInfoSecurity, Daniel said you don’t have to be a coder in order to really do well in his position. He added that being too down in the weeds at the technical level could actually be a little bit of a distraction. At a very fundamental level, cybersecurity isn’t just about the technology but it’s also about the economics of cybersecurity, Daniel noted.

Gizmodo

Gizmodo

  • Words 201
  • Estimated Read 2 min
Read Article

In much the same way that the best heart surgeons have never studied medicine and Supreme Court judges have never really read the law, Michael Daniel, the White House’s cybersecurity co-ordinator thinks that “being too down in the weeds at the technical level could actually be a little bit of a distraction” in his position. In an interview with Gov Info Security, Daniel explained that “[y]ou can get enamored with the very detailed aspects of some of the technical solutions. And, particularly here at the White House … the real issue is to look at the broad, strategic picture and the impact that technology will have.” Which is kinda true, I suppose. He went on to add that “at a very fundamental level, cybersecurity isn’t just about the technology but it’s also about the economics of cybersecurity” before explaining that he doesn’t “have to be a coder in order to do really well.” Which is also… kinda true but perhaps best left unsaid. It’s a bit like a senior surgeon explaining that they don’t know how to use a scalpel or a world-renowned judge admitting that they’re a little shaky on the Fourth Amendment.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Gizmodo

This might be the year Netflix finally adds offline playback
This might be the year Netflix finally adds offline playback

Being able to download content to your device so that you can stream it offline is an essential feature for…

Facebook is now wrapped in a massive political bias scandal
Facebook is now wrapped in a massive political bias scandal

Facebook and Google have become the primary sources of news for a significant chunk of the developed world, which means that…

Pornhub wants virtual reality porn to be accessible to everyone
Pornhub wants virtual reality porn to be accessible to everyone

I wouldn't go so far as to say that Pornhub is at the forefront of technological advancement, but the website is…

The Java plug-in is finally going to meet its long-awaited demise
The Java plug-in is finally going to meet its long-awaited demise

It's been more than two decades since Oracle decided to start plaguing web browsers with its Java plug-in, but it looks like…