The US government wants to begin regulating mobile navigation systems

TECHi's Author Alfie Joshua
Opposing Author Nytimes Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Alfie Joshua
Alfie Joshua
  • Words 118
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Word on the street has it that the US Transportation Department could be looking at the possibility of introducing tougher regulatory control over mobile navigation systems in vehicles as well as on your smartphone or tablet. The US Transportation Department touts that this is so because they would like to play a role in cases where apps happen to end up as a danger to those who share the road with you. Of course, there were cases in the past where GPS failed to get a person to the right destination, but rather, in the wrong direction for more than 900 miles, while another mishap involved the fatal shooting of a man after he arrived at the wrong house.

Nytimes

Nytimes

  • Words 188
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

Getting directions on the road from Google Maps and other smartphone apps is a popular alternative to the expensive navigation aids included in some cars. The apps are also a gray area when it comes to laws banning the use of cellphones or texting while driving. The Transportation Department wants to enter the argument. The department is intensifying its battle against distracted driving by seeking explicit authority from Congress to regulate navigation aids of all types, including apps on smartphones. The measure, included in the Obama administration’s proposed transportation bill, would specify that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has the authority to set restrictions on the apps and later order changes if they are deemed dangerous, much the way it currently regulates mechanical features of cars. The measure has the support of automakers, which already mostly comply with voluntary guidelines for built-in navigation systems, but it has run into stiff opposition from technology companies, which say that any such law would be impractical and impossible to enforce. It’s another example, they say, of federal regulators trying vainly to keep up with a rapidly changing industry.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from New York Times

Fiat Chrysler and Google are creating a fleet of autonomous minivans
Fiat Chrysler and Google are creating a fleet of autonomous minivans

Fiat Chrysler is lagging behind the rest of the automotive industry when it comes to autonomous vehicle development, and CEO Sergio…

China wants to build floating nuclear power plants for its new islands
China wants to build floating nuclear power plants for its new islands

I'm sure you've heard about that man-made island chain that China has built in the South China Sea, the one…

Many of Apple’s engineers would rather quit than assist the FBI
Many of Apple’s engineers would rather quit than assist the FBI

Apple's leadership stands behind the company's decision to fight against the government's demands to break the iPhone's encryption, and it…

Obama has finally spoken out about the encryption debate
Obama has finally spoken out about the encryption debate

Ever since Apple refused to assist the FBI in breaking through the iPhone's encryption last month, the United States has been…