Reddit considers letting users pay for self-promotion

TECHi's Author Jesseb Shiloh
Opposing Author Fastcompany Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Jesseb Shiloh
Jesseb Shiloh
  • Words 105
  • Estimated Read 1 min

A Reddit moderator proposed having content makers pay for putting links to their own content on Reddit Friday morning. The post, which went up on the the moderator news sub-thread, had a full proposal based on discussions that Reddit moderators have had about how to handle self-promotion on the popular forum. The argument behind the proposal is basically that self-promotional links are fine, but there should be some clear way of delineating them from “organic” posts, and ideally finding a way to thread the needle between users who want to see the content and outright spamming by websites eager to get more clicks via Reddit.

Fastcompany

Fastcompany

  • Words 187
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

At the online community Reddit, forum moderators–volunteers who are neither selected by nor employed by Reddit the company–are proposing a new set of rules that would allow users to submit self-promotional links and content for a small fee. Though Reddit has built its reputation as an online Wild West, the startup, which closed a $50 million round last week, has been known for outright banning users who violate its community rules, which include submitting self-promotional content and manipulating votes. (Generally, the startup errs on the side of free speech. Case in point: In light of the celebrity iCloud hack last month, Reddit banned the thread that disseminated the leaked nude photos–not because of privacy violations but because of copyright laws.)Instead of punishing users by banning them, the proposed “paygate” would give content creators looking to promote their own work the ability to pay so they can tag their submissions as “self promotional.” The  proposal did not decide on any type of pay structure. Moderators, who would approve or reject any sponsored content, will decide whether or not their subreddits would opt into these changes.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Fastcompany

Snapchat is almost as popular of a video platform as Facebook
Snapchat is almost as popular of a video platform as Facebook

People have been talking about how Facebook is close to becoming the first serious competitor that YouTube has seen in a…

Samsung wants its smartwatches to identify you using your veins
Samsung wants its smartwatches to identify you using your veins

Soon you won't even need to do anything to have your smartwatch identify you if a recently published Samsung patent…

America and Europe have reached a new Safe Harbor agreement
America and Europe have reached a new Safe Harbor agreement

Last October, the European Court of Justice ruled that the Safe Harbor laws that allowed companies to transfer user data between the…

Nielsen now factors social media shares into television ratings
Nielsen now factors social media shares into television ratings

Nielsen announced on Wednesday that it's expanding Twitter TV Ratings to include Facebook as well, and is renaming it to Social Content…