Amazon is removing its non-compete clause for hourly workers

TECHi's Author Scarlett Madison
Opposing Author Theguardian Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published March 27, 2015 · 11:20 PM EDT
Theguardian View all Theguardian Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published March 27, 2015 Updated January 30, 2024
TECHi's Take
Scarlett Madison
Scarlett Madison
  • Words 85
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Having a non-compete clause in an employee’s contract ensures that, at least for some time after leaving the company, the employee won’t be able to use their skills to help competing companies. It’s something that makes sense for high-skill, upper-level jobs but is it really necessary for Amazon to have a non-compete clause for the regular hourly workers? The company has received quite a bit of criticism for this and has finally decided to do something about it by removing the clause. 

Theguardian

Theguardian

  • Words 177
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

Amazon is to remove a “non-compete” clause from its employment contracts for US workers paid by the hour after criticism that it is unreasonable to prevent such employees from finding other work. A company spokeswoman confirmed to the Guardian that the clause would be cut. “That clause hasn’t been applied to hourly associates, and we’re removing it,” she said. In the past, Amazon has required its US employees, including seasonal workers, to sign non-compete contracts which cover a period of more than 18 months after the employee has separated with the company, the Verge reported on Thursday. According to a contract obtained by the Verge, Amazon workers that signed it pledged not to “engage in or support the development, manufacture, marketing, or sale of any product or service that competes or is intended to compete with any product or service sold, offered, or otherwise provided by Amazon (or intended to be sold, offered, or otherwise provided by Amazon in the future) that employee worked on or supported, or about which employee obtained or received confidential information”.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Theguardian

Spotify collaborates with global music giants to create ethical AI technologies
Spotify collaborates with global music giants to create ethical AI technologies

Spotify is forging a significant collaboration with the major players in the global music industry, Sony, Universal, and Warner, to…

Donkey Kong Comeback Smashes Expectations
Donkey Kong Comeback Smashes Expectations

Donkey Kong Bananza signifies one thrilling transformation on the part of Nintendo and veterans. It is a new release after…

Trump Administration Reportedly Plans to Cut 2,145 NASA Employees
Trump Administration Reportedly Plans to Cut 2,145 NASA Employees

The news that the Trump administration wishes to reduce the number of NASA workers by over two thousand is a…

Google Ordered to Pay $314.6M to Android Users
Google Ordered to Pay $314.6M to Android Users

This is actually a pretty big revelation. Google wasn't just spying on users, it was making them pay for the…