Apple is refusing to back down from its face-off with the FBI

TECHi's Author Chastity Mansfield
Opposing Author Money Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published February 25, 2016 · 8:20 AM EST
Money View all Money Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published February 25, 2016 Updated January 30, 2024
TECHi's Take
Chastity Mansfield
Chastity Mansfield
  • Words 107
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Apple’s face-off with the FBI is close to finishing its second week, and CEO Tim Cook is doing an admirable job of holding his ground, despite the fact that most Americans support the FBI’s position, according to survey results published by the Pew Research Center on Monday. In an interview with ABC on Thursday, Cook reaffirmed his belief that helping the FBI break through the iPhone’s encryption would be bad for both Apple and the American people, even going so far as to call the software required to break the iPhone’s encryption the “equivalent of cancer.”

Money

Money

  • Words 250
  • Estimated Read 2 min
Read Article

Tim Cook isn’t budging on Apple’s faceoff with the FBI. In an interview with ABC’s David Muir that aired Wednesday, Cook said the government shouldn’t be able to force Apple to compromise the privacy of hundreds of millions of iPhone users in order to unlock a terrorist’s iPhone. He said it would force Apple to create “the software equivalent of cancer.” The FBI wants Apple to help investigators bypass the code on a phone that belonged to Syed Farook, one of the shooters in a December 2015 attack in San Bernardino, California that left 14 dead and 22 injured. The matter is now tied up in court, and it has put Cook in the spotlight of a tense national debate about balancing security with privacy. Apple has argued that coding a “back door” into the iPhone would compromise the security of hundreds of millions of its customers. Muir asked Cook if he has “any concern that you might be able to prevent another terrorist attack by breaking into that phone.” Cook responded by saying, “Some things are hard, and some things are right, and some things are both. This is one of those things.” He argued that the software would compromise sensitive information — such as financial data, health records and “the location of our kids.” “This would be bad for America. It would also set a precedent that I think many people in America would be offended by,” Cook says.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Money Cnn

This concealable handgun looks just like a smartphone
This concealable handgun looks just like a smartphone

Even in areas where carrying a gun is both legal and socially acceptable, there's always going to be people who…

Apple’s next earbuds may be semi-modular and wireless
Apple’s next earbuds may be semi-modular and wireless

Apple's earbuds are already pretty awesome for the price, but the company has been awarded a patent that might take the…

Yahoo is killing off most of its digital magazines
Yahoo is killing off most of its digital magazines

Yahoo's financial woes have forced the company to put all of its focus on the businesses that are actually making money,…

Volvo wants to have deathrpoof vehicles on the road before 2020
Volvo wants to have deathrpoof vehicles on the road before 2020

It's been almost a decade since Volvo announced its ambitious plan to make it virtually impossible to be injured or…