Many of Apple’s engineers would rather quit than assist the FBI

TECHi's Author Lorie Wimble
Opposing Author Nytimes Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published March 18, 2016 · 1:20 PM EDT
Nytimes View all Nytimes Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published March 18, 2016 Updated January 30, 2024
TECHi's Take
Lorie Wimble
Lorie Wimble
  • Words 117
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Apple’s leadership stands behind the company’s decision to fight against the government’s demands to break the iPhone’s encryption, and it looks like many of the company’s employees do to. In the event that Apple loses its legal battle with the FBI and is forced to break the iPhone’s encryption, several of the company’s employees have made it clear that they’ll do so begrudgingly, while others would rather leave the company than help undermine the security of the software that they helped create. Only time will tell if these engineers will actually leave their lucrative jobs on principle, but let’s hope that it never comes to that.

Nytimes

Nytimes

  • Words 244
  • Estimated Read 2 min
Read Article

If the F.B.I. wins its court fight to force Apple’s help in unlocking an iPhone, the agency may run into yet another roadblock: Apple’s engineers. Apple employees are already discussing what they will do if ordered to help law enforcement authorities. Some say they may balk at the work, while others may even quit their high-paying jobs rather than undermine the security of the software they have already created, according to more than a half-dozen current and former Apple employees. Among those interviewed were Apple engineers who are involved in the development of mobile products and security, as well as former security engineers and executives. The potential resistance adds a wrinkle to a very public fight between Apple, the world’s most valuable company, and the authorities over access to an iPhone used by one of the attackers in the December mass killing in San Bernardino, Calif. It also speaks directly to arguments Apple has made in legal documents that the government’s demand curbs free speech by asking the company to order people to do things that they consider offensive. “Such conscription is fundamentally offensive to Apple’s core principles and would pose a severe threat to the autonomy of Apple and its engineers,” Apple’s lawyers wrote in the company’s final brief to the Federal District Court for the Central District of California.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Nytimes

Fiat Chrysler and Google are creating a fleet of autonomous minivans
Fiat Chrysler and Google are creating a fleet of autonomous minivans

Fiat Chrysler is lagging behind the rest of the automotive industry when it comes to autonomous vehicle development, and CEO Sergio…

China wants to build floating nuclear power plants for its new islands
China wants to build floating nuclear power plants for its new islands

I'm sure you've heard about that man-made island chain that China has built in the South China Sea, the one…

Obama has finally spoken out about the encryption debate
Obama has finally spoken out about the encryption debate

Ever since Apple refused to assist the FBI in breaking through the iPhone's encryption last month, the United States has been…

The government won’t be able to crack the next-generation iPhones
The government won’t be able to crack the next-generation iPhones

Apple's face-off with the FBI has proven that the government is willing to use legal force to make companies weaken…