Spotify has finally given in to the pressure from record labels

TECHi's Author Brian Molidor
Opposing Author Appleinsider Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published August 11, 2015 · 1:20 AM EDT
Appleinsider View all Appleinsider Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published August 11, 2015 Updated January 30, 2024
TECHi's Take
Brian Molidor
Brian Molidor
  • Words 83
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Spotify has been facing pressure from record labels to kill off its free, ad-supported streaming service for a while now, but it looks likes the company is finally going to cave in. While the free option shouldn’t be disappearing anytime soon, you can expect some new restrictions to be added in the near future. While the terms are still being discussed, people using the free version of Spotify won’t have the same kind of access to content that premium users will. 

Appleinsider

Appleinsider

  • Words 185
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

Although it should continue to provide a free, ad-supported tier, Spotify is reportedly planning to limit some of its music content to Premium subscribers in reaction to pressure from record labels. Some songs or albums may only be available to paying Premium users, whether permanently or temporarily, sources explained to Digital Music News. The exact set of restrictions has yet to be settled, but a free listener might only be able to hear a popular album for a limited amount of time, or listen to just one or two songs from it. One or multiple variations of these concepts could be put into play. The transition will likely happen in early 2016, the people said. This would not only give Spotify the time to cement licensing deals but produce updated Web, desktop, and mobile apps. The sources claimed that the company is responding to pressure from the three largest music labels — Sony, Warner, and Universal — ahead of an October 1 renewal deadline. The CEOs of Sony and Universal in particular have vocally opposed ad-based tiers, since they’re thought to devalue catalogs, and typically generate less revenue.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Appleinsider

Apple Robotics Is Set to Become Its Next Major Revenue Stream
Apple Robotics Is Set to Become Its Next Major Revenue Stream

Analysts from Morgan Stanley foresee Apple diving into robotics as its next big business, predicting this sector could generate about…

Spotify is accusing Apple of using its power to hinder its competition
Spotify is accusing Apple of using its power to hinder its competition

The problem with Apple releasing its own music-streaming service is that it now has to compete with existing services like Spotify…

The government’s legal war with the tech industry is far from over
The government’s legal war with the tech industry is far from over

The legal war between the government and the tech industry has quieted down in the weeks since the highly-publicized battle…

Future iPhones might have a glass casing instead of an aluminum one
Future iPhones might have a glass casing instead of an aluminum one

Apple is nothing if not a trend-setter, which makes it difficult for the company to continuously differentiate its products from the…