Two Takes Balanced

The FCC thinks it’s about time we overhauled the set-top box market

via Techhive
2 min read
Jan 27, 2016
Read Original Article

TECHi's Analysis

145 words

If the FCC has its way, cable subscribers in the United States will be able to lower their cable bills by choosing their own set-top boxes instead of the ones that their cable provider gives them. As it stands now, most subscribers rent their set-top boxes from their provider, and there have been numerous complaints that these boxes are overpriced and tend to favor content of the provider’s choosing. The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday that FCC chairman Tom Wheeler wants to change this by allowing subscribers to use apps and set-top boxes of their choosing, which will not only allow them to escape their provider’s rental fees, but grant them more access to Internet-based content. As I’m sure you can imagine, cable and media companies aren’t fond of the idea, but Wheeler is moving forward with the proposal anyway.

VS

Techhive's Report

242 words

Cable TV subscribers could get some relief from expensive set-top-box rental fees under a proposal from federal regulators. The proposal, from Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler, would put traditional pay TV programming on a wider range of devices and apps, the Wall Street Journal reports. For instance, companies like Google and Roku could offer their own boxes that integrate cable television with Internet programming. The Journal’s story doesn’t explain how this would work, but it sounds like Wheeler is leaning toward a system proposed last month by advocacy groups and some tech firms, including Google, TiVo, and Vizio. This group, called the Consumer Video Choice Coalition, recently met with the FCC to demonstrate its system, which displayed pay TV content from various providers using “off-the-shelf equipment and open standards,” Ars Technica reported. Not surprisingly, the cable industry strongly opposes this plan, arguing that it would be difficult to implement and could interfere with positioning deals, in which some networks pay more to appear higher in the channel guide. “They say it’s just a box, [but] it’s allowing another company to build an entirely different offering” from traditional cable service, said Michael Powell, president of the National Cable & Telecommunications Association. It’s unclear why this would be a bad thing for consumers, but the industry also raises privacy concerns, pointing out that a company like Google could gain access to cable viewing data and advertise against it.

TECHi's Verdict: Balanced

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

More from Techhive

YouTube might be working on an online television service
YouTube might be working on an online television service

With the release of its ad-free subscription service and the exclusive content that comes with it, YouTube has turned itself into an emerging Netflix…

Redbox is trying its hand at online streaming again
Redbox is trying its hand at online streaming again

Judging from the fact that most people don't even know that Redbox and Verizon tried to release their own Netflix-killer…

Amazon is experimenting with ad-supported television shows
Amazon is experimenting with ad-supported television shows

Amazon's most-recent venture is actually a step backwards in terms of advancement, as it takes the company into a market that's…

This new streaming app is like a combination of Netflix and YouTube
This new streaming app is like a combination of Netflix and YouTube

Xumo isn't really bringing anything new to the video streaming market, but it's combining the best parts of Netflix and…