YouTube had to rework itself in order to compete with Netflix

TECHi's Author Chastity Mansfield
Opposing Author Fastcompany Read Source Article
Last Updated Originally published May 20, 2015 · 3:20 AM EDT
Fastcompany View all Fastcompany Two Takes by TECHi Read the original story Published May 20, 2015 Updated January 30, 2024
TECHi's Take
Chastity Mansfield
Chastity Mansfield
  • Words 91
  • Estimated Read 1 min

As the third most popular website in the world, you’d think that YouTube would be rolling in cash, but that’s not the case. In fact, despite making billions of dollars from advertisements, the Google-owned company is barely able to make a profit thanks to the fact that many people who watch YouTube videos do so through other services, such as Facebook. As other companies like HBO and Netflix continue to gain ground in the video-streaming market, YouTube has been forced to implement some new technologies in order to compete. 

Fastcompany

Fastcompany

  • Words 196
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

The war over our eyeballs is heating up, and that’s mostly a good thing for people who like to look at screens. Just as Meerkat, Periscope, and Snapchat elbow each other in a battle over appointment viewing, and digitally native companies like Netflix and Hulu duke it out over the future of TV and movies, an old-school competitor shows up and throws down a shiny new gauntlet: Last month, HBO Now launched just in time for cord-cutters to catch the debut of the new season of Game of Thrones. There’s never before been such an abundance of quality, readily accessible television fighting for our attention. YouTube, however, has found itself in this new golden age of video with a serious handicap: While its overall viewership was growing, most of that growth was happening across the web at large, outside of its own site and apps. That made it harder to capture eyes and ad dollars, and to appeal to cherished mobile users. When Susan Wojcicki became CEO last year, she would continue efforts to transform the way it served ads and engaged with its creators, pouring money into certain channels and promoting them heavily.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Fastcompany

Snapchat is almost as popular of a video platform as Facebook
Snapchat is almost as popular of a video platform as Facebook

People have been talking about how Facebook is close to becoming the first serious competitor that YouTube has seen in a…

Samsung wants its smartwatches to identify you using your veins
Samsung wants its smartwatches to identify you using your veins

Soon you won't even need to do anything to have your smartwatch identify you if a recently published Samsung patent…

America and Europe have reached a new Safe Harbor agreement
America and Europe have reached a new Safe Harbor agreement

Last October, the European Court of Justice ruled that the Safe Harbor laws that allowed companies to transfer user data between the…

Nielsen now factors social media shares into television ratings
Nielsen now factors social media shares into television ratings

Nielsen announced on Wednesday that it's expanding Twitter TV Ratings to include Facebook as well, and is renaming it to Social Content…