Google has started complying with the EU’s “right to be forgotten” law

TECHi's Author Chastity Mansfield
Opposing Author Online Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Chastity Mansfield
Chastity Mansfield
  • Words 118
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Google is now complying in full with a European Court Of Justice ruling last month which requires it to remove specific personal information from search results when an individual has made a request for the removal of “outdated” or “irrelevant” information about them. A search for a person’s name on a European Google website now includes the following disclaimer flagging up the fact that some information may have been removed, and including a link to a Google FAQ explaining why: “Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe.” The same search on Google.com does not bring up the disclaimer as the ECJ ruling only requires Google remove information from European search results.

Online

Online

  • Words 191
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

Google Inc. said Thursday that it has started removing results from its search engine under Europe’s new “right to be forgotten,” implementing a landmark May ruling by the European Union’s top court that gives individuals the right to request removal of results that turn up in Internet searches for their own names. Google engineers overnight updated the company’s technical infrastructure to start implementing the removals, and Thursday began sending the first emails to individuals informing them that links they had requested were being taken down. Only a small number of the initial wave of requests has been processed. “This week we’re starting to take action on the removals requests that we’ve received,” a Google spokesman said. “This is a new process for us. Each request has to be assessed individually, and we’re working as quickly as possible to get through the queue.” As of nearly a month ago, Google had received more than 41,000 removal requests via aweb form it had set up in response to the ruling, which said Google must weigh individuals’ right to privacy against a public interest in having certain information available.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Wall Street Journal

AI Medical Scribe Startup Abridge Achieves $5.3 Billion Valuation in Latest Funding Round
AI Medical Scribe Startup Abridge Achieves $5.3 Billion Valuation in Latest Funding Round

Abridge's 93% valuation jump in four months tells us that something bigger than typical startup growth is cooking. It's a…

The man leading Apple’s electric vehicle project is leaving the company
The man leading Apple’s electric vehicle project is leaving the company

The man that was leading Apple's ultra-secret electric vehicle project has decided to leave the company, according to the Wall…

AT&T’s CEO claims corporations have no say in the encryption debate
AT&T’s CEO claims corporations have no say in the encryption debate

When it comes to respecting the privacy of its users and rejecting profligate government surveillance, few companies have as bad…

Apple made more than $20 billion from the App Store last year
Apple made more than $20 billion from the App Store last year

Whenever you hear about the ridiculous amounts of money that mobile games like Candy Crush Sage and Clash of Clans make,…