Canada has deemed online anonymityto be vital to personal privacy

TECHi's Author Sal McCloskey
Opposing Author Online Read Source Article
Last Updated
TECHi's Take
Sal McCloskey
Sal McCloskey
  • Words 116
  • Estimated Read 1 min

Congratulations, citizens of Canada, it’s your God-given right to travail the internet as UrTheWurst420 hurling sexually graphic insults at children singing pop songs on YouTube. And, unless the police get a warrant, they won’t be able to tie that account to your actual identity. In a landmark ruling the Supreme Court of Canada found that online anonymity is a vital component of personal privacy. The ruling came down following the case of Matthew Spencer, who was tried and convicted for possessing child pornography in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Law enforcement asked Shaw Communications for information on a particular user, including the name and address on the account, which would now require a search warrant to obtain.

Online

Online

  • Words 181
  • Estimated Read 1 min
Read Article

Internet users in Canada should expect a reasonable degree of anonymity online, and telecommunications companies cannot hand over their private information to law-enforcement agencies without a court order, Canada’s top court ruled Friday. The unanimous 8-0 ruling from the Supreme Court of Canada was hailed as a seminal decision by the country’s privacy watchdog. But it could have broad implications for how police investigate cases ranging from drug trafficking to terrorism. The case began over the means by which police in Saskatchewan obtained information during an investigation into possession of child pornography. The Supreme Court said police in the western province acted unlawfully when they sought and received personal information from an Internet service provider about a suspect without a judge’s permission. Those actions violated the Internet user’s privacy rights, the court said. “Some degree of anonymity is a feature of much Internet activity and depending on the totality of the circumstances, anonymity may be the foundation of a privacy interest that engages constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure,” the court said in its written decision.

Source

NOTE: TECHi Two-Takes are the stories we have chosen from the web along with a little bit of our opinion in a paragraph. Please check the original story in the Source Button below.

Balanced Perspective

TECHi weighs both sides before reaching a conclusion.

TECHi’s editorial take above outlines the reasoning that supports this position.

More Two Takes from Wall Street Journal

AI Medical Scribe Startup Abridge Achieves $5.3 Billion Valuation in Latest Funding Round
AI Medical Scribe Startup Abridge Achieves $5.3 Billion Valuation in Latest Funding Round

Abridge's 93% valuation jump in four months tells us that something bigger than typical startup growth is cooking. It's a…

The man leading Apple’s electric vehicle project is leaving the company
The man leading Apple’s electric vehicle project is leaving the company

The man that was leading Apple's ultra-secret electric vehicle project has decided to leave the company, according to the Wall…

AT&T’s CEO claims corporations have no say in the encryption debate
AT&T’s CEO claims corporations have no say in the encryption debate

When it comes to respecting the privacy of its users and rejecting profligate government surveillance, few companies have as bad…

Apple made more than $20 billion from the App Store last year
Apple made more than $20 billion from the App Store last year

Whenever you hear about the ridiculous amounts of money that mobile games like Candy Crush Sage and Clash of Clans make,…