Believe it or not, the Director of the NSA is actually pro-encryption

Total
0
Shares

The Director of the National Security Agency is the last person I’d expect to come out in support of encryption, but that’s exactly what Mike Rogers did on Thursday when he said that “encryption is foundational to the future.” Unlike a number of politicians, such as FBI Director James Comey, Rogers claims that he doesn’t believe “security is the imperative and that ought to drive everything.” Both he and the White House have given up on the idea of outlawing unbreakable end-to-end encryption for the time being, though some state governments haven’t, but that doesn’t mean that they support unbreakable encryption either, something Apple CEO Tim Cook isn’t happy about. America is still trying to figure out how to balance privacy and security in regards to encryption, and as Comey himself said: “We’ve got some challenging times ahead of us, folks.”

National Security Agency Director Adm. Mike Rogers said Thursday that “encryption is foundational to the future,” and arguing about it is a waste of time. Speaking to the Atlantic Council, a Washington, D.C., think tank, Rogers stressed that the cybersecurity battles the U.S. is destined to fight call for more widespread use of encryption, not less. “What you saw at OPM, you’re going to see a whole lot more of,” he said, referring to the massive hack of the Office of Personnel Management involving the personal data about 20 million people who have gotten background checks. “So spending time arguing about ‘hey, encryption is bad and we ought to do away with it’ … that’s a waste of time to me,” he said, shaking his head. “So what we’ve got to ask ourselves is, with that foundation, what’s the best way for us to deal with it? And how do we meet those very legitimate concerns from multiple perspectives?” Other government officials — most notably FBI Director James Comey — have been crusading for a way that law enforcement can get access to encrypted data. But technologists pretty much universally agree that creating some sort of special third-party access would weaken encryption to the point that it would threaten every internet transaction we make, from online banking to filling out our health records to emailing our friends and significant others. A hole in encryption for special FBI access would be a hole that criminals could sneak through, too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up for Techi's Special Newsletter

Newsletters are not just for grabbing attention. I promise to deliver the best disruptive technologies in your inbox once or twice a month.

You May Also Like