https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYXSOaC1xv8
Though it may now be hard to remember, there was a time that Sony was the company that led the tech world. Sony, after all, were the people who helped bring us the Walkman and the CD player. For years, the Sony brand was synonymous with cutting edge technology and sophisticated design.
But while Sony are still a powerhouse in the world of tech, it’s now common knowledge they are no longer its leaders. We all know why: their commitment to closed, proprietary technology hurt them immensely in the internet age and now, other more web-savvy companies dominate our new media world. Apple are now the go-to innovators in design and functionality; Nintendo and Microsoft have leapfrogged Sony this gaming generation; and Samsung, Panasonic and others make consumer tech that is just as good, if not better, than Sony’s.
It’s true that Sony have improved lately. Having returned to profitability last quarter, the Playstation 3 is now finally hitting its stride; with its Reader line, the company has showed a commitment to open technologies; and Internet TV (discussed in the video above) seems to at least be thinking outside the box.
But in the face of incredibly tough competition, it’s not enough. To churn out one or two decent products is not enough in a world that relies on integrated ecosystems and a tight connection between software and hardare.
No, what Sony needs is to build on what it has started with InternetTV. To put it simply, what Sony needs is Google.
But it isn’t just tablets that may benefit from this hypothetical partnership. Sony’s gaming division might too.
After all, now that Sony are just giving games away for free, you can tell they are getting pretty desperate about the PSP. But my theory is that they’re trying to extend the life of the PSP because the PSP2 just isn’t ready yet. Why? Well, Sony must know that in order for the PSP2 to be compelling, it has to match the iPhone. Yes, the games will be a priority – but it will also have to have apps, a touchscreen, excellent media capabilities and web browsing. Otherwise, why buy it? This is obviously taking a long time.
But the best way Sony can ensure the creation of a truly compelling device is to work with the folks at Mountain View to create a customized Android-based solution. Sure, Sony has very legitimate security concerns; it has hit the PSP hard. But if they worked with Google to address those specifically, and at the same time allowed themselves access to Android Market, they’d have a viable competitor to the iPhone’s media functionality and array of apps.
Of course, using Android would also mean that Sony could release two versions of the PSP2 – one with a phone and one without – making it much more competitive than the current PSP, which is struggling to stay relevant. By basing the PSP2 on a custom version of Android, Sony could have the must-have all-in-one device the original PSP was supposed to be.
How Google Can Save… Sony? Yes, Sony.

Disclosure: Some of the links in this article are affiliate links and we may earn a small commission if you make a purchase, which helps us to keep delivering quality content to you. Here is our disclosure policy.
LEAVE A REPLY
Similar Stories
Facebook was once the most obvious place for connecting with friends. Over the years, though the platform slowly became an...
TikTok is set to launch TikTok Shop in France, Germany, and Italy next Monday. In 2021, TikTok opened its first...
We live in an era where cybersecurity is paramount, but human error can never be prevented even by the most secure messaging...
A PSP phone would be pretty cool…especially if it ran Android. But had the ability to play great games without worrying about buttons or graphics…
Honestly, I think Sony is doing fine. For their PS3 they are pumping out quite a few triple A titles. They are starting to get a profit from the PS3 and I have no doubt this trend will continue.
Their PSP line needs some work. I am not saying it is not an enjoyable product, because I use my PSP often, it is actually right next to me, as I type. It just needs some work.
The statement that the PSP2 needs ” apps, a touchscreen, excellent media capabilities and web browsing. Otherwise, why buy it?” is a ridiculous statement.
The PSP is a gaming console, as its main function. Its main function is not supposed to be a web browsing, media player that you go into Starbucks to search the web and listen to some music, while eating a scone with a cup of Jo. The PSP’s purpose is to be a portable gaming console first. It is in no way even in the same category as the iPad or iPhone. Yes, I know both having gaming capabilities. It is in the category of portable gaming consoles, with the Nintendo DS.
Also take note that the Nintendo DS does not have any of your amazing features and is doing very well.
Therefore since it is first-most and foremost a gaming console the PSP2 will not need, apps, a touchscreen, and excellent media capabilities to succeed.
These would be nice features, but the PSP already offers web browsing and a giant gaming library that you can access via internet and a credit/debit card or go to the store.
Because the PSP is a gaming console and Sony has a very strong grip on making gaming products it is inevitable that it will succeed without these features or a partnership with a top notch company. These features would just push the PSP2 to be more successful, not successful, but more successful.
A Sony/Google partnership would be amazing, no one would be able to touch those 2. A Tablet that kicks iPad’s ass, PSP2, who knows, maybe even Chrome OS on the PS3. That would be a dream come true.
Google has partnered with Sony already so saying it would be awesome is incorrect… it is awesome. it shows up in google tv. the only one so far is a Sony. they have already started prototype psp/phones running android. Thomas, chrome os is just about garbage right now and would be a bad fit for the ps3. a Google tv focused os would be the best because of the fact that chrome os focuses almost exclusively on the internet and its benefits. this is all well and good but a ps3 needs something less focused on internet documents and web browsing… ps3 already does that… it needs a beefier localy baced os. this is not too far away.
Sony is making right moves now but they are also limmiting themselves. they made linux almost imposable to run on the ps3. saying no to open source? really bad idea. just look at apple in a few years when everyone figures out that they are overpaying for products that are “easy to use”. if you cant run windows without getting viruses and having it crash every 7 seconds u are the typical “ifan”. your stupid ass will buy anything with an i infront of it.sorry about the rant of apple hate. the products are quality but it is the people i hate…. and closed source.
back to Sony. Sony will soon impeed Googles explosive groth and a newer and more open company will be used more and more by google. if there isnt a conpany that google can use they will just make one. i want to be holding google stock when or if that happens
so the truth for now is that Googles partnership with Sony is still in its infancy but will grow withing the next year. expect to see an ericson or something that looks like a psp. expect your ps3 to gain a shitload more apps and maybe even a new system that is compatible with google tv. expect to see psp games on the android market. maybe the psp2 but that will be the ipod touch of sony devices. meaning it will be good to play games on and have cool software but will lack the abilities of a phone. and for the same price(plus data charges(OVERPRICED)) why not get the phone? soexpect good out of sony for about a year or two then in about a year expect to see a new face in this gaming/computing/telecommunications industry.
should i start a blog?
-WOH