JD Rucker JD Rucker is Editor at Soshable, a Social Media Marketing Blog. He is a Christian, a husband, a father, and founder of both Judeo Christian Church and Dealer Authority. He drinks a lot of coffee, usually in the form of a 5-shot espresso over ice. Find him on Twitter, Facebook, and Pinterest.

Will someone please give SETI $5 million so we can continue the pointless search

1 min read

SETI

SETI

Between a budget shortfall in California and cuts in federal funding, the ongoing “Search for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence” is going into hibernation mode this month. Mountain View’s SETI Institute has pulled the plug on the Allen Telescope Array, a field of radio dishes that scan space for signals from aliens.

Tom Pierson, CEO of SETI Institute, sent an email to major sponsors. “Effective this week, the ATA has been placed into hibernation due to funding shortfalls for operations of the Hat Creek Radio Observatory (HCRO) where the ATA is located.”

So, what is it going to take? With automakers, banks, and seemingly everyone else getting billions in bailout money, you probably think that continuing the search is something that would be on par with other bailouts.

Nope.

“The bottom line is that it takes approximately $1.5M/year to operate the ATA, and at least an additional $1M/year to cover the cost of our SETI science efforts. Thus, right now, we are trying to raise $5M to cover a two-year search of the Kepler Worlds by Jill Tarter and her team,” Pierson explained.

“Assuming funding can be acquired, we plan to spend the next two years listening to the 1,235 exoplanet candidates that the Kepler mission announced in February. This fabulous opportunity represents a fundamental shift to be able to point.”

Help keep the search alive

Credit Cards

We started looking at different things that get more funding than the $5 million it will take to keep SETI going, but it was too much. The number is so insanely low (from a crowdfunded perspective) that you don’t need comparisons. You don’t need to be convinced. If you’re reading this, you’re probably a fellow geek at heart and would love to see us continue the search.

Here’s how: donate.

Quickly.

Now.

Between the various social media sites and subscribers to this site, we should be able to make a dent in it. Get your credit cards out and just do it.

Why the search is pointless

ET

We support the search. It’s important to keep our ears open for transmissions that may belong to “them.” It’s simply too small of a dollar amount to keep it going for us to let it die.

With that said, let’s face it. When “they” are ready to contact us, they probably won’t need us to find them. They’ll find us.

Live long and prosper, SETI.

Avatar of JD Rucker
JD Rucker JD Rucker is Editor at Soshable, a Social Media Marketing Blog. He is a Christian, a husband, a father, and founder of both Judeo Christian Church and Dealer Authority. He drinks a lot of coffee, usually in the form of a 5-shot espresso over ice. Find him on Twitter, Facebook, and Pinterest.

What does Google Search tell us about Brexit?

Close to 72% of the voters in the United Kingdom took part in yesterday’s historical referendum, with 52% of them voting to leave the European...
Avatar of Lorie Wimble Lorie Wimble
1 min read

Many of Apple’s engineers would rather quit than assist…

Apple’s leadership stands behind the company’s decision to fight against the government’s demands to break the iPhone’s encryption, and it looks like many of...
Avatar of Lorie Wimble Lorie Wimble
1 min read

Steve Wozniak stands behind Apple in the encryption debate

When Steve Wozniak, the co-founder of Apple, decided to do a Reddit AMA on Wednesday, one of the most popular questions that was asked...
Avatar of Carl Durrek Carl Durrek
1 min read

2 Replies to “Will someone please give SETI $5 million so we…”

  1. Your last part of this article kind of misses the point, in that we aren’t necessarily looking for intelligent beings with the ability to “find” us. We’re just looking for any kind of radio signal that would point to intelligent beings. We’ve been broadcasting radio signals for a 100 years now, but during that time we haven’t had the technology to communicate/find other intelligent beings out there. That doesn’t mean our signals couldn’t be detected by beings with the means to do so.

  2. Your last part of this article kind of misses the point, in that we aren’t necessarily looking for intelligent beings with the ability to “find” us. We’re just looking for any kind of radio signal that would point to intelligent beings. We’ve been broadcasting radio signals for a 100 years now, but during that time we haven’t had the technology to communicate/find other intelligent beings out there. That doesn’t mean our signals couldn’t be detected by beings with the means to do so.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *