Editorial accountability
Every claim in TECHi reporting is open to scrutiny. If you spot a factual error, a misattribution, a broken link, or anything that's gone stale — tell us. We review reports against available sources and publish material corrections when the review supports a change.
What counts
Factual errors of any kind, misattributed quotes or sources, broken or wrong links, math and calculation slips, and material outdated information — even on older pieces. If a fact in print would be a correction in print, we treat it the same here.
What we don't
Editorial disagreement, opinion-vs-fact framing, or differences in interpretation. We'll happily publish a letter to the editor for those, but we don't retroactively change opinion pieces because a reader disagrees with the take.
How it works
Reader submits via the form below. An editor reviews the claim against primary sources and article records. If the fix is warranted, we publish a dated correction note on the affected article and a public entry on this page. If it is not warranted, we explain the decision by email.
Report a correction
The more specific the better — a linked primary source or an exact quote helps us verify quickly. We'll email you when the review is complete.
Public log
Every approved correction, newest first. Each entry links back to the article it corrects.
Correction log is temporarily unavailable. Please try again shortly.
For other editorial concerns, write to info@techi.com. For urgent legal or safety issues, see our contact page.