Show the work
Market data, rankings, forecasts, and analyst scores need visible methodology, source context, and limits. A clean chart is not enough if the reader cannot understand the inputs.
Trust manifesto
Trust is earned when readers can inspect the proof.
A short path to TECHi accountability pages, followed by the full policy directory for readers who want every standard, method, disclosure, and right.
Last reviewed June 3, 2026
The promise
Readers should not have to guess why a TECHi story deserves their time. The answer should be visible on the page: a named writer, a clear source trail, a method for numbers and rankings, and a way to challenge us when we miss something.
TECHi grew out of technology coverage and now publishes for readers who use AI, markets, crypto, and company research to make consequential decisions. That shift raises the bar. Our standards pages exist so the promise is inspectable, not just stated.
This hub is the front door to that system. Start with the core proof pages below, then use the full directory when you need a specific policy, data method, disclosure, or legal right.
Start here
The six proof pages most readers need first.
The full directory is useful for compliance and audit work, but these are the pages that answer the questions readers usually bring to a story, quote page, byline, or correction.
Checking an article?Editorial StandardsThe main rulebook for sourcing, fact-checking, independence, disclosures, and review.Checking market data?Data MethodologyProvider stack, fallbacks, stale data handling, and limits on quote and market pages.Checking a mistake?Corrections PolicyHow readers report errors and how TECHi handles corrections or clarifications.Checking a byline?Research TeamHow TECHi separates publishers, editors, contributors, analysts, and reviewers.Checking a source?Source DirectoryThe public archive of source records used across TECHi pages.Checking financial limits?Financial DisclaimerThe plain boundary: research and journalism, not personalized financial advice.
Operating rules
What we owe the reader.
Separate people, process, and promotion
Author identity, editorial review, analyst approval, advertising, and contributor status are separate signals. We do not let one badge pretend to cover all of them.
Correct in public
Material errors should be fixed with a dated correction or clarification. Silent rewrites protect a page for a day and damage the brand for years.
Keep improving the system
TECHi Intelligence has a roadmap and version history because the model is not finished. Better coverage, better data, and clearer confidence labels belong in public view.
Full directory
Every public standard, grouped by reader need.
The list stays complete for accountability, but the grouping keeps closely related policies together instead of forcing every reader through the same long index.
Editorial proofHow articles are assigned, checked, corrected, and separated from sponsored or community material.Open
Editorial StandardsSourcing, fact-checking, independence, disclosures, workflow tools, and analyst rules.Corrections PolicyHow readers flag errors and how material corrections are handled.Publication PrinciplesThe public principles behind what TECHi publishes and why.Our EthicsConflict, independence, fairness, and reader-first editorial conduct.Community GuidelinesReader-side conduct rules for community participation.Comments PolicyHow public comments are moderated and reviewed.Contributor GuidelinesWhat outside contributors must meet before work appears on TECHi.Reviews GuaranteeHow product, service, and review claims are handled.
Data and market proofHow TECHi handles market data, quote pages, scores, source records, and financial limitations.Open
Data MethodologyProvider stack, fallbacks, stale data handling, and what market pages do not claim.TECHi IntelligenceThe public method behind TECHi Intelligence scores and model inputs.Model RoadmapPlanned improvements to scoring, coverage, source transparency, and confidence labels.Version HistoryWhat changed in each TECHi Intelligence version.How We ScoreThe scoring overview behind public research and rankings.Analyst Score RulesHow analyst performance scoring is separated from popularity and promotion.Source DirectoryThe archive of source records used across TECHi pages.Financial DisclaimerThe plain limit: TECHi is research and journalism, not personalized financial advice.
People and company proofWho runs TECHi, who writes research, and how readers can reach the team.Open
About TECHiThe company story behind TECHi and the rebuild that expanded its finance coverage.Research TeamHow TECHi separates publishers, editors, contributors, approved analysts, and reviewers.AnalystsPublic analyst profiles and research participation surfaces.Analyst LeaderboardPerformance tracking for eligible analyst calls with locked baselines.ContactThe route for corrections, business questions, and reader concerns.Advertise with UsCommercial contact information, sponsorship boundaries, and paid-review disclosures.Brand KitPublic brand assets and identity references.
Reader rights and legal proofPrivacy, accessibility, terms, cookies, and regional data-rights pages readers should not have to hunt for.Open
Privacy PolicyHow TECHi handles reader data and privacy expectations.Terms and ConditionsThe terms that govern use of the site.Cookies PolicyHow cookies and similar technologies are used.CCPA Privacy PolicyCalifornia privacy rights and related reader controls.GDPR ComplianceEuropean privacy rights and data-handling commitments.Digital AccessibilityAccessibility commitments and reporting route.