Meta Platforms faced harsh rebukes from its Oversight Board for sweeping policy changes in January. The Board condemned the company for neglecting fact-checking and easing restrictions on sensitive topics like immigration and gender identity. 

Even though the Oversight Board is funded by Meta, it still operates independently. It is strongly recommended that the tech giants assess the “potential adverse effects” of the changes in policy which were implemented just before President Trump began his 2nd term.

The board said that the policy overhaul was hasty and lacked transparency. It also noted that Meta has not shared whether it had checked human rights before making the changes. This move signals that CEO Mark Zuckerberg is trying to re-establish ties with conservatives and ease off content moderation. This criticism is going to challenge Meta’s leadership.

Meta’s Overhaul Draws Mixed Content Rulings

The Oversight Board first issued a decision on content after Meta changed its polices. Some supported retaining transgender posts while others urged to change it. Meta supported some decisions, while it didn’t respond to some requiring content removal.

Issue Recommended By Oversight Board

The board made 17 recommendations along with its content ruling. Some of these are as follows:

  • To clarify the hate ideologies that are prohibited.
  • To assess the impact of these policy changes in conflict zones.
  • To review the effectiveness of the new Community Notes tools every six months. Meta’s new Community Notes is now replacing its partnerships with fact-checking groups like Reuters.
  • To strengthen the policy against bullying and harassment.

The board has given 60 days to Meta to respond to these recommendations.

Meta Still Supports Oversight Board

Meta is still committed to supporting the board. Paolo Carozza, Co-Chair of Oversight Board, hinted that there are no signs that Meta will reduce the support or engagement with the board.

Additionally, Meta is following the trend of the past four years by maintaining the continual submission of content cases to the board. The company has pledged that it will allocate a $35 million fund to the board through 2027.