Apple is taking difficult but vital measures to lessen its reliance on China. China still plays a vital part in the company’s manufacturing activities despite the fact that it is making great progress in diversifying its supply chain. A careful balance between reducing geopolitical risks and preserving operational effectiveness will be necessary for the future. Apple’s tactics will probably be used as a template by other global firms dealing with comparable difficulties as it negotiates this complicated environment.

In the book, Patrick McGee, who covered the company for the Financial Times, uses more than 200 interviews with former engineers and executives in addition to other sources to give a compelling story of how Apple became dependent on Chinese consumers for 17% of its sales last year and Chinese suppliers for the majority of its products. Its history has valuable lessons for the two economies, as well as for other large businesses like Tesla, as it rushes to establish new manufacturing sites.

Geopolitical difficulties, trade uncertainty, and the need for a more robust supply chain have all contributed to Apple’s strategic decision to lessen its reliance on China during the past few years. An outline of the changes that preceded the current developments is provided below:

Net income of Alle's net income from 2025 to 2024

Source: https://www.statista.com/statistics/267728/apples-net-income-since-2005/ 

Handling the Difficulties of Reducing China’s Dependency

Apple’s enormous operations in China, particularly its relationships with Taiwanese companies like Foxconn and its broad network of Chinese suppliers, have played a crucial role in the company’s metamorphosis into a $3 trillion enterprise. But under President Xi Jinping, growing state power and rising geopolitical concerns have forced Apple to reconsider its reliance on Chinese production. In addition to making large investments in the United States, CEO Tim Cook is leading efforts to diversify Apple’s supply chain by moving a sizable portion of manufacturing to Vietnam and India. Despite being crucial for long-term resilience, these calculated actions have significant costs and could result in price rises for customers.

apple's net sales in greater chine since fiscal year 2010

Regional Changes and Diversification Initiatives

Apple is aggressively growing its manufacturing presence outside of China in response to the changing geopolitical environment. In a major departure from its previous reliance on Chinese manufacturing, the company has started producing the iPhone 16 series in India, including the high-end Pro models. Additionally, Apple has strengthened its local supply chain by collaborating with more than 40 Indian businesses, including Wipro and Dixon Technologies. Additionally, Apple’s dedication to expanding its manufacturing base in Southeast Asia is demonstrated by CEO Tim Cook’s trips to Vietnam and Indonesia.

Effects on the Economy and Market Responses

There are economic ramifications to Apple’s change in strategy. The business must deal with higher manufacturing relocation costs as well as possible tariffs. For example, Apple expects price rises for the future iPhone 17 models, in part because of additional capabilities and design improvements. The business is nonetheless concerned about how the ongoing geopolitical tensions would affect its operations in the long run, even with the interim 90-day U.S.-China tariff truce.

Long-term, this will result in greater costs, even before tariffs are taken into account. For instance, Reuters reported last month that the cost of manufacturing phones in India can be up to 10% higher than in China, citing sources. It is much more unrealistic to manufacture in the United States. An iPhone manufactured in the United States might cost $3,500, more than three times the current price, according to Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities. 

Apple’s production footprint may eventually mimic that of Tesla, as Elon Musk’s electric vehicle company has established factories in China, Germany, and the United States. Washington’s willingness to continue investing in and supporting Chinese suppliers is less certain. Washington will be keenly monitoring the Chinese activities of both companies as they push into artificial intelligence and Tesla talks up the possibility of creating humanoid robots.