Skip to main content
Research tools
US market hours

Regular hours: 9:30 AM–4:00 PM America/New_York

Next open: Checking…

Exchange calendar includes scheduled holidays and early closes. Extended-session prices appear separately only when supplied by the quote source.

Compare stocks

Open shareable comparison

Up to four covered tickers. Each observation retains its source date.

Methodology published · Market data, model notes, and corrections process are public · Data policy · Corrections policy

NASDAQ · Industrials · Forecast

Eos Energy Enterprises forecast & outlook

Analyst expectations, the TECHi model and your own scenarios answer different questions. None is a guaranteed outcome.

Section freshness

Research as of Sep 26, 10:01 PM EDT · Prices as of Sep 25, 4:00 PM EDT · Fundamentals checked Sep 26, 10:01 PM EDT · Statements Jun 30, 2026

EOSE

Market closedLatest regular-session print

$3.17

▼ -$0.0800(-2.47%)4:00 PM ET - vs previous close

Quote as of Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

US market market is closed. Showing the latest available regular-session trade from Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT.

52w high$19.86

52w low$3.01

Yahoo Finance · latest regular-session print · as of Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT · delay not stated · current source

Today3%
$3.16L Sep 25 '26$3.33H Sep 25 '26

Wall Street consensus

Ratings
Buy · 17
EPS estimate count
5
Revenue estimate count
11

Strong buy 3 · Buy 6 · Hold 8 · Sell 0 · Strong sell 0

The target sample count and exact target horizon are not supplied in this dataset. Rating counts and earnings-estimate counts describe separate samples. The low analyst target is the bottom of the observed target range, not a bound on possible losses.

Loading estimate history…

TECHi Signal

Model v1.0. Input coverage measures data availability, not predictive accuracy or the probability of profit. The factors and evaluated horizons below use this page’s dated snapshot.

Evidence lab

TECHi Signal unavailable — insufficient input coverage

TECHi Forward Model Score

MODEL

48

/100

Quant signal · 1D–6M

Fundamental outlook · 1Y–3Y

Strategic secular context · 5Y+

CONFIDENCELow confidence

61 of 75 inputs are available.

History progress

Past returns in Signal

Scored windows

5 Years

0/100

-76.4%

-25.1% CAGR

$13.43 to $3.16

2021-09-24 to 2026-09-25

5-year progress prioritizes compounding behavior to make strategic drift visible.

1 Year

0/100

-69.8%

-69.9% CAGR

$10.49 to $3.16

2025-09-25 to 2026-09-25

1-year progress blends current return with annualized context for cleaner long-cycle comparison.

Last month

37/100

-5.2%

CAGR unavailable

$3.34 to $3.16

2026-08-26 to 2026-09-25

1-month progress reflects recent tape with less sensitivity than daily windows.

Last week

0/100

-20.1%

CAGR unavailable

$3.96 to $3.16

2026-09-18 to 2026-09-25

1-week progress tracks short-cycle tape and can rotate meaningfully with each close cluster.

Yesterday

35/100

-2.5%

CAGR unavailable

$3.24 to $3.16

2026-09-24 to 2026-09-25

1-day progress tracks latest close-to-close momentum from tape.

2 empty progress windows are hidden until enough closes exist.

A-Z factor map

Available scoring inputs

22/26 factors

4 unscored inputs are hidden until the quote stack has verified fields for them.

Balance sheet

C

Cash runway

Balance sheet · 57/100

Current 3.26x; cash/debt 0.7x

Method

Checks liquidity, leverage, and balance-sheet room.

Coverage

H

Historical data coverage

Coverage · 100/100

1481 closes analyzed

Method

More closes improve backtest coverage and reduce thin-history risk.

Data coverage

Z

Zero-missing risk

Data coverage · 51/100

10 missing fields

Method

Shows how much the model is relying on available fields versus placeholders.

External view

A

Analyst conviction

External view · 44/100

Consensus 3.71; upside +105.4%; disagreement +189.6%

Method

Uses consensus, target spread, target disagreement, revisions, and latest EPS surprise.

I

Implied upside

External view · 100/100

Target move +105.4%; disagreement +189.6%

Method

Measures analyst target room versus the latest quote and flags wide high-low target dispersion.

Forecast

U

Upside scenarios

Forecast · 50/100

Future 79/100; analyst 44/100

Method

Combines TECHi future-value signal with outside target support.

Growth

G

Growth pulse

Growth · 100/100

Revenue +351.4%; EPS unavailable

Method

Compares latest YoY sales and earnings momentum.

Y

Year-over-year proof

Growth · 54/100

1M windows 38/100; 3M windows 24/100

Method

Looks for repeated conversion from past setups into later closes.

Momentum

J

Jump signal

Momentum · 0/100

5D return -20.1%

Method

Captures the newest short-term price impulse.

W

52-week position

Momentum · 26/100

Range position +0.9%

Method

Scores trend strength while trimming crowded highs.

Quality

F

Free cash flow

Quality · 3/100

FCF margin -50.1%; yield -9.4%

Method

Connects profit quality to cash generation and market value.

K

Key margins

Quality · 0/100

Gross -84.7%; operating -142.6%

Method

Rewards margin breadth before assigning quality confidence.

O

Operating leverage

Quality · 0/100

Operating margin -142.6%

Method

Shows whether revenue is converting into operating profit.

Q

Quality trend

Quality · 26/100

Quality composite 26/100

Method

Combines margins, returns, growth, and cash conversion.

Risk

B

Beta risk

Risk · 35/100

Beta 2.779

Method

Lower and steadier beta earns a stronger risk-adjusted score.

Strategic

S

Social/developer

Strategic · 50/100

Social composite 50/100

Method

Uses verified public channels and developer gravity when available.

Technical risk

D

Drawdown control

Technical risk · 12/100

90D max drawdown -67.7%

Method

Scores whether recent losses stayed controlled versus the latest peak.

Technicals

M

MACD pressure

Technicals · 13/100

MACD hist -0.06; slope -0.03

Method

Reads MACD line pressure against its signal line plus histogram direction.

R

RSI balance

Technicals · 40/100

RSI 14 37.4; Stoch %K 0.3

Method

Rewards constructive oscillator momentum without extreme overbought stretch.

T

Technical tape

Technicals · 25/100

20D -7.5%; ATR 10.4%; %B 0.11

Method

Blends returns, SMA/EMA crosses (below), RSI, MACD, Stochastic, Bollinger Bands, ATR, volume, volatility, and drawdown.

V

Volume confirmation

Technicals · 60/100

Volume 33.1M vs avg 26.9M

Method

Checks whether price movement is confirmed by trading activity.

Valuation

P

PE and PEG

Valuation · 65/100

Forward PE unavailable; PEG unavailable; EV/Sales 6.8x

Method

Penalizes expensive multiples unless growth support is visible.

Composite formula

Composite = normalized weighted sum (14% quality trend, 12% technical tape, 12% momentum, 12% historical setup factor, 11% future value, 10% valuation, 10% analyst/revision, 7% risk brake, 6% news sentiment, 4% leadership, 2% social/developer traction), confidence-adjusted toward neutral by input coverage^0.7 x freshness factor x missing-critical-field penalty x analyst-disagreement penalty

Strategic inputs

0 roadmap items, 1 leadership roles, 0 social/developer channels, human-impact lens unavailable.

Factual coverage

80/100 from 88/98 sourced fields, 45% live source health, and 10 missing fields.

Accuracy trail

14.4% rolling hit rate across 1078 scored signals. Hit rate is measured against subsequent price history for each horizon. Treat it as a proxy, not audited performance.

Guardrail

Constructive, Neutral, and Cautious are research states, not buy, hold, or sell instructions. The percent beside a horizon is a scenario estimate. A low directional-match figure is how often a previous price-direction estimate lined up with a later close. It is not model accuracy.

Bull case

Uncalibrated

Illustration expected return withheld

Not a calibrated forecast. The price-direction replay is a separate test and is not this percent. Momentum holds, quality signals stay firm, future-product execution improves, and valuation pressure does not widen.

Base case

Uncalibrated

Illustration expected return withheld

Not a calibrated forecast. The price-direction replay is a separate test and is not this percent. Weighted factor model using price, fundamentals, analyst, sentiment, roadmap, leadership, social traction, and risk inputs.

Stress case

Uncalibrated

Illustration expected return withheld

Not a calibrated forecast. The price-direction replay is a separate test and is not this percent. Volatility, missing-data, valuation, and balance-sheet brakes are applied to the setup.

Horizon model

Horizon matrix

Timeframe-specific weights: trading windows lean on tape; investor windows lean on quality, valuation, and revisions; strategic windows lean on future value.

Quant signal · 1D–6M

Short-horizon tape and factor read. This is the only band called a TECHi Signal.

1 Day

31/100 signal · 15/100 conf · 80/100 facts

Neutral

Neutral, expected return withheld

Required baselines are not published, so this page does not show an expected return.

Drivers Technical tape 25/100 · Momentum setup 30/100

7 Days

33/100 signal · 15/100 conf · 80/100 facts

Neutral

Neutral, expected return withheld

Required baselines are not published, so this page does not show an expected return.

Drivers Technical tape 25/100 · Momentum setup 30/100

15 Days

35/100 signal · 15/100 conf · 80/100 facts

Neutral

Neutral, expected return withheld

Required baselines are not published, so this page does not show an expected return.

Drivers Technical tape 25/100 · Momentum setup 30/100

30 Days

38/100 signal · 18/100 conf · 80/100 facts

Neutral

Neutral, expected return withheld

Required baselines are not published, so this page does not show an expected return.

Drivers Technical tape 25/100 · Momentum setup 30/100

3 Months

44/100 signal · 18/100 conf · 80/100 facts

Neutral

Neutral, expected return withheld

Required baselines are not published, so this page does not show an expected return.

Drivers Quality trend 26/100 · Future value 79/100

6 Months

45/100 signal · 18/100 conf · 80/100 facts

Neutral

Neutral, expected return withheld

Required baselines are not published, so this page does not show an expected return.

Drivers Quality trend 26/100 · Future value 79/100

Fundamental outlook · 1Y–3Y

One- to three-year fundamental context. Not the quant signal.

1 Year

47/100 signal · 20/100 conf · 80/100 facts

Neutral

Illustrative fundamental scenario — unvalidated

Neutral setup. Price testing stops at six months and is not out of sample.

Drivers Quality trend 26/100 · Future value 79/100

3 Years

51/100 signal · 23/100 conf · 80/100 facts

Neutral

Illustrative fundamental scenario — unvalidated

Neutral setup. Price testing stops at six months and is not out of sample.

Drivers Quality trend 26/100 · Future value 79/100

Strategic secular context · 5Y+

Five-year and longer context. Not ranked, and not the quant signal.

5 Years

50/100 signal · 23/100 conf · 80/100 facts

Neutral

Illustrative fundamental scenario — unvalidated

Neutral setup. Price testing stops at six months and is not out of sample.

Drivers Quality trend 26/100 · Future value 79/100

10 Years

50/100 signal · 23/100 conf · 80/100 facts

Neutral

Illustrative fundamental scenario — unvalidated

Neutral setup. Price testing stops at six months and is not out of sample.

Drivers Quality trend 26/100 · Future value 79/100

Price-direction backtest

Daily scoring history

Tests whether the model's price-derived direction matched later closes — it does not yet validate the fundamental, analyst, or sentiment factors, which need persisted daily history. Longer and multi-year horizons score once enough closes have matured.

What this percent is
A Constructive call counts when the later close rose by more than a small hold band. A Cautious call counts when the later close fell by more than that band. A Neutral call counts when the later close stayed inside the band. The percent is how often that direction matched. It is not a claim that the full model is accurate.
Observations
1078 scored signals across 6 horizons
Sample period
1 Day: 1 trading sessions · 7 Days: 7 trading sessions · 15 Days: 15 trading sessions · 30 Days: 30 trading sessions · 3 Months: 63 trading sessions · 6 Months: 126 trading sessions
Benchmark
Buy-and-hold, a random directional call, and 20-session momentum are scored on these same samples. The S&P 500, a sector ETF, and analyst consensus are not on this replay, so those baselines are not scored. None of this is a walk-forward test or a published universe result.
Same-sample baselines
  • 1 Day. Buy and hold hit 41.6% versus model 26.0% (baseline hit rate higher by 15.6 pts); signed return -0.5% versus model 0.3% (model signed return higher by 0.8 pts) · Random directional call hit 33.3% versus model 26.0% (baseline hit rate higher by 7.3 pts); signed return 0.0% versus model 0.3% (model signed return higher by 0.3 pts) · Simple momentum hit 46.1% versus model 26.0% (baseline hit rate higher by 20.1 pts); signed return -0.4% versus model 0.3% (model signed return higher by 0.7 pts)
  • 7 Days. Buy and hold hit 37.6% versus model 27.2% (baseline hit rate higher by 10.4 pts); signed return -2.7% versus model 0.1% (model signed return higher by 2.8 pts) · Random directional call hit 33.3% versus model 27.2% (baseline hit rate higher by 6.1 pts); signed return 0.0% versus model 0.1% (model signed return higher by 0.1 pts) · Simple momentum hit 46.5% versus model 27.2% (baseline hit rate higher by 19.3 pts); signed return -1.7% versus model 0.1% (model signed return higher by 1.8 pts)
  • 15 Days. Buy and hold hit 36.6% versus model 13.2% (baseline hit rate higher by 23.4 pts); signed return -5.5% versus model 0.1% (model signed return higher by 5.6 pts) · Random directional call hit 33.3% versus model 13.2% (baseline hit rate higher by 20.1 pts); signed return 0.0% versus model 0.1% (model signed return higher by 0.1 pts) · Simple momentum hit 49.3% versus model 13.2% (baseline hit rate higher by 36.1 pts); signed return 0.3% versus model 0.1% (baseline signed return higher by 0.2 pts)
  • 30 Days. Buy and hold hit 38.9% versus model 3.7% (baseline hit rate higher by 35.2 pts); signed return -12.2% versus model -1.3% (model signed return higher by 10.9 pts) · Random directional call hit 33.3% versus model 3.7% (baseline hit rate higher by 29.6 pts); signed return 0.0% versus model -1.3% (baseline signed return higher by 1.3 pts) · Simple momentum hit 42.6% versus model 3.7% (baseline hit rate higher by 38.9 pts); signed return -5.1% versus model -1.3% (model signed return higher by 3.8 pts)
  • 3 Months. Buy and hold hit 14.0% versus model 3.8% (baseline hit rate higher by 10.2 pts); signed return -34.8% versus model 0.0% (model signed return higher by 34.8 pts) · Random directional call hit 33.3% versus model 3.8% (baseline hit rate higher by 29.5 pts); signed return 0.0% versus model 0.0% (signed returns match) · Simple momentum hit 42.7% versus model 3.8% (baseline hit rate higher by 38.9 pts); signed return -6.0% versus model 0.0% (model signed return higher by 6.0 pts)
  • 6 Months. Buy and hold hit 0.0% versus model 0.0% (hit rates match); signed return -54.2% versus model 0.0% (model signed return higher by 54.2 pts) · Random directional call hit 33.3% versus model 0.0% (baseline hit rate higher by 33.3 pts); signed return 0.0% versus model 0.0% (signed returns match) · Simple momentum hit 75.5% versus model 0.0% (baseline hit rate higher by 75.5 pts); signed return 20.6% versus model 0.0% (baseline signed return higher by 20.6 pts)
Calibration error
1 Day 5.5% average absolute error · 7 Days 16.1% average absolute error · 15 Days 22.8% average absolute error · 30 Days 30.1% average absolute error · 3 Months 42.2% average absolute error · 6 Months 52.9% average absolute error
Directional accuracy
14.4% of scored price-direction calls matched the later close
False-positive rate
Not scored yet. This history has no Constructive calls to measure.
Outcome by horizon
1 Day 26.0% on 219 observations · 7 Days 27.2% on 213 observations · 15 Days 13.2% on 205 observations · 30 Days 3.7% on 190 observations · 3 Months 3.8% on 157 observations · 6 Months 0.0% on 94 observations
Sector
Industrials. This names the company sector. It is not a sector performance breakdown.
Dates
Methodology reviewed May 28, 2026. Validation dataset updated September 23, 2026. Model version v1.0. These are three different dates.
Out of sample
These figures replay price-derived factors on stored daily closes for this symbol. They are not a walk-forward test, a holdout period, or a separate out-of-sample test. They do not score fundamentals, analyst revisions, or sentiment, and they do not adjust for survivorship or look-ahead bias.

1 Day

Directional match

26.0%

Price-tested

219 daily scores · 5.5% avg error

Latest: Cautious -0.9% vs -2.5% actual

7 Days

Directional match

27.2%

Price-tested

213 daily scores · 16.1% avg error

Latest: Neutral -0.3% vs -19.6% actual

15 Days

Directional match

13.2%

Price-tested

205 daily scores · 22.8% avg error

Latest: Neutral -0.7% vs -9.6% actual

30 Days

Directional match

3.7%

Price-tested

190 daily scores · 30.1% avg error

Latest: Neutral -0.2% vs -23.9% actual

3 Months

Directional match

3.8%

Price-tested

157 daily scores · 42.2% avg error

Latest: Neutral -2.1% vs -46.6% actual

6 Months

Directional match

0.0%

Price-tested

94 daily scores · 52.9% avg error

Latest: Neutral -2.9% vs -34.3% actual

4 horizon lanes are hidden until enough future closes mature.

7 validations appear once TECHi has tracked enough daily factor history for them.

Technical tape

Price-tested

26.6%

432 samples · latest 2026-09-24

Validated daily from historical price tape: SMA, RSI, MACD, volatility, drawdown, and short returns.

Momentum setup

Price-tested

15.1%

608 samples · latest 2026-09-16

Validated from rolling forward returns after trend and range-position signals.

Historical setup factor

Price-tested

3.7%

347 samples · latest 2026-08-13

This lane is a setup score from return windows, long-run CAGR, and earnings surprises. It is not the price-tested validation percent.

Risk brake

Price-tested

7.3%

552 samples · latest 2026-09-03

Validated as a price-history proxy: volatility, drawdown, and risk brakes are checked against later downside/upside behavior.

Loading dated observations…

Scenario builder

Start with one baseline and change the assumptions. These illustrative outputs are separate from analyst targets and the TECHi model.

EOSE scenario builder

Set your revenue, net margin, shares outstanding and exit P/E. Start with one baseline, then add and edit alternatives. Shares outstanding are a starting assumption, not diluted weighted-average shares. These are illustrative scenarios, not analyst targets.

EPS × multiple

Implied price · 12 months

Enter assumptions

Your assumptions; not a forecast or analyst target.

Baseline · 12 months
Implied EPS
Enter positive assumptions
Implied price (USD)
—
Return vs current price
—

EPS = revenue × net margin ÷ diluted shares. Price = EPS × exit P/E. This simplified model excludes dividends, discounting and financing changes beyond your share-count assumption. Baseline shares use current shares outstanding; adjust for expected dilution. Revenue and margin are trailing figures; the multiple may use a forward earnings basis.

All data sources

Search the dated figures used for this view. Each entry identifies its units, reporting period and calculation status.

How to use this page

Use this to answer the core investor question for this tab.

Best for Focused evidence that complements the main quote dashboard.

Weak when Provider data is delayed, sparse, or not yet confirmed by filings.

Browse all companies and funds