US market hours
Regular hours: 9:30 AM–4:00 PM America/New_York
Next open: Checking…
Exchange calendar includes scheduled holidays and early closes. Extended-session prices appear separately only when supplied by the quote source.
Shortcuts
/ search · W watchlist · C compare · F financials · E earnings · N news · T technicals · Esc close

NASDAQ · Technology · Forecast
Akamai Technologies, Inc. forecast & outlook
Analyst expectations, the TECHi model and your own scenarios answer different questions. None is a guaranteed outcome.
Section freshness
Research as of Sep 26, 12:03 PM EDT · Prices as of Sep 25, 4:00 PM EDT · Fundamentals checked Sep 26, 9:23 PM EDT · Statements Jun 30, 2026
AKAM
$113.94
▲ +$3.53(+3.20%)4:00 PM ET - vs previous closeQuote as of Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
US market market is closed. Showing the latest available regular-session trade from Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT.
52w high$165.45
52w low$70.82
Yahoo Finance · latest regular-session print · as of Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT · delay not stated · current source
Wall Street consensus
- Ratings
- Buy · 33
- EPS estimate count
- 25
- Revenue estimate count
- 25
Strong buy 7 · Buy 14 · Hold 11 · Sell 1 · Strong sell 0
The target sample count and exact target horizon are not supplied in this dataset. Rating counts and earnings-estimate counts describe separate samples. The low analyst target is the bottom of the observed target range, not a bound on possible losses.
Loading estimate history…
TECHi Signal
Model v1.0. Input coverage measures data availability, not predictive accuracy or the probability of profit. The factors and evaluated horizons below use this page’s dated snapshot.
Evidence lab
TECHi Signal unavailable — insufficient input coverage
TECHi Forward Model Score
MODEL52
/100
Quant signal · 1D–6M
Fundamental outlook · 1Y–3Y
Strategic secular context · 5Y+
CONFIDENCELow confidence
58 of 75 inputs are available.
History progress
Past returns in Signal
Scored windows
20 Years
60/100+132.6%
+4.3% CAGR
$48.99 to $113.94
2006-09-25 to 2026-09-25
20-year progress favors long-run compounding context when full daily history is incomplete.
10 Years
70/100+118.1%
+8.1% CAGR
$52.25 to $113.94
2016-09-23 to 2026-09-25
10-year progress tracks decade-scale compounding structure when enough closes exist.
5 Years
52/100+3.5%
+0.7% CAGR
$110.13 to $113.94
2021-09-24 to 2026-09-25
5-year progress prioritizes compounding behavior to make strategic drift visible.
1 Year
100/100+51.2%
+51.2% CAGR
$75.38 to $113.94
2025-09-25 to 2026-09-25
1-year progress blends current return with annualized context for cleaner long-cycle comparison.
Last month
63/100+5.4%
CAGR unavailable
$108.06 to $113.94
2026-08-26 to 2026-09-25
1-month progress reflects recent tape with less sensitivity than daily windows.
Last week
82/100+9.0%
CAGR unavailable
$104.52 to $113.94
2026-09-18 to 2026-09-25
1-week progress tracks short-cycle tape and can rotate meaningfully with each close cluster.
Yesterday
70/100+3.2%
CAGR unavailable
$110.41 to $113.94
2026-09-24 to 2026-09-25
1-day progress tracks latest close-to-close momentum from tape.
A-Z factor map
Available scoring inputs
22/26 factors
4 unscored inputs are hidden until the quote stack has verified fields for them.
Balance sheet
Cash runway
Balance sheet · 74/100
Current 1.64x; cash/debt unavailable
Method
Checks liquidity, leverage, and balance-sheet room.
Coverage
Historical data coverage
Coverage · 100/100
6538 closes analyzed
Method
More closes improve backtest coverage and reduce thin-history risk.
Data coverage
Zero-missing risk
Data coverage · 57/100
10 missing fields
Method
Shows how much the model is relying on available fields versus placeholders.
External view
Analyst conviction
External view · 56/100
Consensus 3.82; upside +39.4%; disagreement +115.9%
Method
Uses consensus, target spread, target disagreement, revisions, and latest EPS surprise.
Implied upside
External view · 100/100
Target move +39.4%; disagreement +115.9%
Method
Measures analyst target room versus the latest quote and flags wide high-low target dispersion.
Forecast
Upside scenarios
Forecast · 51/100
Future 59/100; analyst 56/100
Method
Combines TECHi future-value signal with outside target support.
Growth
Growth pulse
Growth · 8/100
Revenue unavailable; EPS -26.8%
Method
Compares latest YoY sales and earnings momentum.
Year-over-year proof
Growth · 46/100
1M windows 54/100; 3M windows 76/100
Method
Looks for repeated conversion from past setups into later closes.
Momentum
Jump signal
Momentum · 74/100
5D return +9%
Method
Captures the newest short-term price impulse.
52-week position
Momentum · 68/100
Range position +45.6%
Method
Scores trend strength while trimming crowded highs.
Quality
Free cash flow
Quality · 32/100
FCF margin unavailable; yield +1.1%
Method
Connects profit quality to cash generation and market value.
Key margins
Quality · 61/100
Gross unavailable; operating +17.8%
Method
Rewards margin breadth before assigning quality confidence.
Operating leverage
Quality · 64/100
Operating margin +17.8%
Method
Shows whether revenue is converting into operating profit.
Quality trend
Quality · 37/100
Quality composite 37/100
Method
Combines margins, returns, growth, and cash conversion.
Risk
Beta risk
Risk · 88/100
Beta 0.635
Method
Lower and steadier beta earns a stronger risk-adjusted score.
Strategic
Social/developer
Strategic · 50/100
Social composite 50/100
Method
Uses verified public channels and developer gravity when available.
Technical risk
Drawdown control
Technical risk · 12/100
90D max drawdown -34.8%
Method
Scores whether recent losses stayed controlled versus the latest peak.
Technicals
MACD pressure
Technicals · 79/100
MACD hist 1.32; slope -0.1
Method
Reads MACD line pressure against its signal line plus histogram direction.
RSI balance
Technicals · 67/100
RSI 14 53.4; Stoch %K 47.6
Method
Rewards constructive oscillator momentum without extreme overbought stretch.
Technical tape
Technicals · 58/100
20D +2.4%; ATR 5.8%; %B 0.79
Method
Blends returns, SMA/EMA crosses (above), RSI, MACD, Stochastic, Bollinger Bands, ATR, volume, volatility, and drawdown.
Volume confirmation
Technicals · 100/100
Volume 31.6M vs avg 4.3M
Method
Checks whether price movement is confirmed by trading activity.
Valuation
PE and PEG
Valuation · 53/100
Forward PE unavailable; PEG unavailable; EV/Sales unavailable
Method
Penalizes expensive multiples unless growth support is visible.
Composite formula
Composite = normalized weighted sum (14% quality trend, 12% technical tape, 12% momentum, 12% historical setup factor, 11% future value, 10% valuation, 10% analyst/revision, 7% risk brake, 6% news sentiment, 4% leadership, 2% social/developer traction), confidence-adjusted toward neutral by input coverage^0.7 x freshness factor x missing-critical-field penalty x analyst-disagreement penalty
Strategic inputs
0 roadmap items, 1 leadership roles, 0 social/developer channels, human-impact lens unavailable.
Factual coverage
80/100 from 92/102 sourced fields, 43% live source health, and 10 missing fields.
Accuracy trail
11.3% rolling hit rate across 1078 scored signals. Hit rate is measured against subsequent price history for each horizon. Treat it as a proxy, not audited performance.
Guardrail
Constructive, Neutral, and Cautious are research states, not buy, hold, or sell instructions. The percent beside a horizon is a scenario estimate. A low directional-match figure is how often a previous price-direction estimate lined up with a later close. It is not model accuracy.
Bull case
UncalibratedIllustration expected return withheld
Not a calibrated forecast. The price-direction replay is a separate test and is not this percent. Momentum holds, quality signals stay firm, future-product execution improves, and valuation pressure does not widen.
Base case
UncalibratedIllustration expected return withheld
Not a calibrated forecast. The price-direction replay is a separate test and is not this percent. Weighted factor model using price, fundamentals, analyst, sentiment, roadmap, leadership, social traction, and risk inputs.
Stress case
UncalibratedIllustration expected return withheld
Not a calibrated forecast. The price-direction replay is a separate test and is not this percent. Volatility, missing-data, valuation, and balance-sheet brakes are applied to the setup.
Horizon model
Horizon matrix
Timeframe-specific weights: trading windows lean on tape; investor windows lean on quality, valuation, and revisions; strategic windows lean on future value.
Quant signal · 1D–6M
Short-horizon tape and factor read. This is the only band called a TECHi Signal.
1 Day
57/100 signal · 15/100 conf · 80/100 facts
Neutral, expected return withheld
Required baselines are not published, so this page does not show an expected return.
Drivers Technical tape 58/100 · Momentum setup 61/100
7 Days
57/100 signal · 15/100 conf · 80/100 facts
Neutral, expected return withheld
Required baselines are not published, so this page does not show an expected return.
Drivers Technical tape 58/100 · Momentum setup 61/100
15 Days
56/100 signal · 15/100 conf · 80/100 facts
Neutral, expected return withheld
Required baselines are not published, so this page does not show an expected return.
Drivers Technical tape 58/100 · Momentum setup 61/100
30 Days
55/100 signal · 16/100 conf · 80/100 facts
Neutral, expected return withheld
Required baselines are not published, so this page does not show an expected return.
Drivers Momentum setup 61/100 · Technical tape 58/100
3 Months
54/100 signal · 16/100 conf · 80/100 facts
Neutral, expected return withheld
Required baselines are not published, so this page does not show an expected return.
Drivers Quality trend 37/100 · Valuation pressure 61/100
6 Months
53/100 signal · 16/100 conf · 80/100 facts
Neutral, expected return withheld
Required baselines are not published, so this page does not show an expected return.
Drivers Quality trend 37/100 · Valuation pressure 61/100
Fundamental outlook · 1Y–3Y
One- to three-year fundamental context. Not the quant signal.
1 Year
54/100 signal · 18/100 conf · 80/100 facts
Illustrative fundamental scenario — unvalidated
Neutral setup. Price testing stops at six months and is not out of sample.
Drivers Quality trend 37/100 · Valuation pressure 61/100
3 Years
53/100 signal · 22/100 conf · 80/100 facts
Illustrative fundamental scenario — unvalidated
Neutral setup. Price testing stops at six months and is not out of sample.
Drivers Quality trend 37/100 · Future value 59/100
Strategic secular context · 5Y+
Five-year and longer context. Not ranked, and not the quant signal.
5 Years
53/100 signal · 22/100 conf · 80/100 facts
Illustrative fundamental scenario — unvalidated
Neutral setup. Price testing stops at six months and is not out of sample.
Drivers Quality trend 37/100 · Future value 59/100
10 Years
53/100 signal · 22/100 conf · 80/100 facts
Illustrative fundamental scenario — unvalidated
Neutral setup. Price testing stops at six months and is not out of sample.
Drivers Quality trend 37/100 · Future value 59/100
Price-direction backtest
Daily scoring history
Tests whether the model's price-derived direction matched later closes — it does not yet validate the fundamental, analyst, or sentiment factors, which need persisted daily history. Longer and multi-year horizons score once enough closes have matured.
- What this percent is
- A Constructive call counts when the later close rose by more than a small hold band. A Cautious call counts when the later close fell by more than that band. A Neutral call counts when the later close stayed inside the band. The percent is how often that direction matched. It is not a claim that the full model is accurate.
- Observations
- 1078 scored signals across 6 horizons
- Sample period
- 1 Day: 1 trading sessions · 7 Days: 7 trading sessions · 15 Days: 15 trading sessions · 30 Days: 30 trading sessions · 3 Months: 63 trading sessions · 6 Months: 126 trading sessions
- Benchmark
- Buy-and-hold, a random directional call, and 20-session momentum are scored on these same samples. The S&P 500, a sector ETF, and analyst consensus are not on this replay, so those baselines are not scored. None of this is a walk-forward test or a published universe result.
- Same-sample baselines
- 1 Day. Buy and hold hit 46.1% versus model 9.6% (baseline hit rate higher by 36.5 pts); signed return 0.2% versus model -0.2% (baseline signed return higher by 0.4 pts) · Random directional call hit 33.3% versus model 9.6% (baseline hit rate higher by 23.7 pts); signed return 0.0% versus model -0.2% (baseline signed return higher by 0.2 pts) · Simple momentum hit 44.7% versus model 9.6% (baseline hit rate higher by 35.1 pts); signed return 0.0% versus model -0.2% (baseline signed return higher by 0.2 pts)
- 7 Days. Buy and hold hit 49.3% versus model 9.9% (baseline hit rate higher by 39.4 pts); signed return 1.4% versus model -0.1% (baseline signed return higher by 1.5 pts) · Random directional call hit 33.3% versus model 9.9% (baseline hit rate higher by 23.4 pts); signed return 0.0% versus model -0.1% (baseline signed return higher by 0.1 pts) · Simple momentum hit 41.3% versus model 9.9% (baseline hit rate higher by 31.4 pts); signed return -1.7% versus model -0.1% (model signed return higher by 1.6 pts)
- 15 Days. Buy and hold hit 46.8% versus model 13.2% (baseline hit rate higher by 33.6 pts); signed return 2.7% versus model 0.0% (baseline signed return higher by 2.7 pts) · Random directional call hit 33.3% versus model 13.2% (baseline hit rate higher by 20.1 pts); signed return 0.0% versus model 0.0% (signed returns match) · Simple momentum hit 37.1% versus model 13.2% (baseline hit rate higher by 23.9 pts); signed return -4.5% versus model 0.0% (model signed return higher by 4.5 pts)
- 30 Days. Buy and hold hit 51.6% versus model 11.1% (baseline hit rate higher by 40.5 pts); signed return 5.4% versus model 0.0% (baseline signed return higher by 5.4 pts) · Random directional call hit 33.3% versus model 11.1% (baseline hit rate higher by 22.2 pts); signed return 0.0% versus model 0.0% (signed returns match) · Simple momentum hit 45.8% versus model 11.1% (baseline hit rate higher by 34.7 pts); signed return -2.9% versus model 0.0% (model signed return higher by 2.9 pts)
- 3 Months. Buy and hold hit 68.2% versus model 10.2% (baseline hit rate higher by 58.0 pts); signed return 12.7% versus model 0.0% (baseline signed return higher by 12.7 pts) · Random directional call hit 33.3% versus model 10.2% (baseline hit rate higher by 23.1 pts); signed return 0.0% versus model 0.0% (signed returns match) · Simple momentum hit 51.6% versus model 10.2% (baseline hit rate higher by 41.4 pts); signed return 3.0% versus model 0.0% (baseline signed return higher by 3.0 pts)
- 6 Months. Buy and hold hit 81.9% versus model 16.0% (baseline hit rate higher by 65.9 pts); signed return 31.3% versus model 0.0% (baseline signed return higher by 31.3 pts) · Random directional call hit 33.3% versus model 16.0% (baseline hit rate higher by 17.3 pts); signed return 0.0% versus model 0.0% (signed returns match) · Simple momentum hit 66.0% versus model 16.0% (baseline hit rate higher by 50.0 pts); signed return 20.3% versus model 0.0% (baseline signed return higher by 20.3 pts)
- Calibration error
- 1 Day 2.6% average absolute error · 7 Days 7.7% average absolute error · 15 Days 11.2% average absolute error · 30 Days 15.0% average absolute error · 3 Months 21.6% average absolute error · 6 Months 30.3% average absolute error
- Directional accuracy
- 11.3% of scored price-direction calls matched the later close
- False-positive rate
- Not scored yet. This history has no Constructive calls to measure.
- Outcome by horizon
- 1 Day 9.6% on 219 observations · 7 Days 9.9% on 213 observations · 15 Days 13.2% on 205 observations · 30 Days 11.1% on 190 observations · 3 Months 10.2% on 157 observations · 6 Months 16.0% on 94 observations
- Sector
- Technology. This names the company sector. It is not a sector performance breakdown.
- Dates
- Methodology reviewed May 28, 2026. Validation dataset updated September 23, 2026. Model version v1.0. These are three different dates.
- Out of sample
- These figures replay price-derived factors on stored daily closes for this symbol. They are not a walk-forward test, a holdout period, or a separate out-of-sample test. They do not score fundamentals, analyst revisions, or sentiment, and they do not adjust for survivorship or look-ahead bias.
1 Day
Directional match
9.6%
219 daily scores · 2.6% avg error
Latest: Neutral +0.3% vs +3.2% actual
7 Days
Directional match
9.9%
213 daily scores · 7.7% avg error
Latest: Neutral -0.2% vs +9.1% actual
15 Days
Directional match
13.2%
205 daily scores · 11.2% avg error
Latest: Neutral -0.2% vs +7.0% actual
30 Days
Directional match
11.1%
190 daily scores · 15.0% avg error
Latest: Neutral +1.2% vs -9.1% actual
3 Months
Directional match
10.2%
157 daily scores · 21.6% avg error
Latest: Neutral -1.5% vs +0.6% actual
6 Months
Directional match
16.0%
94 daily scores · 30.3% avg error
Latest: Neutral +2.4% vs -2.8% actual
4 horizon lanes are hidden until enough future closes mature.
7 validations appear once TECHi has tracked enough daily factor history for them.
Technical tape
Price-tested9.7%
432 samples · latest 2026-09-24
Validated daily from historical price tape: SMA, RSI, MACD, volatility, drawdown, and short returns.
Momentum setup
Price-tested11.4%
608 samples · latest 2026-09-16
Validated from rolling forward returns after trend and range-position signals.
Historical setup factor
Price-tested10.7%
347 samples · latest 2026-08-13
This lane is a setup score from return windows, long-run CAGR, and earnings surprises. It is not the price-tested validation percent.
Risk brake
Price-tested11.6%
552 samples · latest 2026-09-03
Validated as a price-history proxy: volatility, drawdown, and risk brakes are checked against later downside/upside behavior.
Loading dated observations…
Scenario builder
Start with one baseline and change the assumptions. These illustrative outputs are separate from analyst targets and the TECHi model.
AKAM scenario builder
Set your revenue, net margin, shares outstanding and exit P/E. Start with one baseline, then add and edit alternatives. Shares outstanding are a starting assumption, not diluted weighted-average shares. These are illustrative scenarios, not analyst targets.
EPS = revenue × net margin ÷ diluted shares. Price = EPS × exit P/E. This simplified model excludes dividends, discounting and financing changes beyond your share-count assumption. Baseline shares use current shares outstanding; adjust for expected dilution. Revenue and margin are trailing figures; the multiple may use a forward earnings basis.
All data sources
Search the dated figures used for this view. Each entry identifies its units, reporting period and calculation status.
How to use this page
Use this to answer the core investor question for this tab.
Best for Focused evidence that complements the main quote dashboard.
Weak when Provider data is delayed, sparse, or not yet confirmed by filings.
