Skip to main content
Methodology published · Market data, model notes, and corrections process are public · Data policy · Corrections policy
TSM logo

TAIWAN STOCK EXCHANGE · Technology · TECHi Signal

Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) Stock Rating & Risk Score

TECHi Signal compresses current quote, fundamental, technical, analyst, and strategic inputs into one explainable research stance for TSM.

Start here

TSM: Balanced watch

Balanced watch. Quality trend (88/100) is the strongest signal; technical tape (50/100) is the main constraint. Model confidence is 6/100 — some inputs are unavailable, so treat this as a directional research screen rather than a forecast. It ranks #3/120 across the TECHi coverage universe and #2/69 in Technology. Use the top read for speed, then inspect the Formula lab when you need the full evidence trail.

Signal

51/100

Low confidence

Inputs

15/76

43/100 factual coverage

Universe

#3/120

98/100 peer percentile

Nearest

Hold

1 Day +0.2%

Formula signalLow confidence15/76 inputsLast updated Aug 21, 4:00 PM EDT

Balanced watch

Dashboard view for the current Signal score, confidence, input coverage, and active horizon. The full narrative read lives in Start Here; the evidence trail is consolidated below.

Technical tape

50/100

12% wt

0/16 inputs

Forecast layer

82/100

10% wt

1/5 inputs

Valuation

63/100

10% wt

4/8 inputs

Risk brake

73/100

7% wt

3/8 inputs

51

Signal score

Active horizon

1 day to 10 years + strategic setup

43/100 factual coverage, 14% live source health.

TECHi coverage universe

TSM against fresh TECHi coverage.

Peer ranks are recalculated from the latest live quotes, so the context moves when the underlying data moves.

Universe rank

#3/120

98/100 percentile among scored peers.

Sector rank

#2/69

Technology coverage cohort.

Fresh symbols

120

120 tickers scored in the trailing week.

Freshest pull

Aug 30, 2026

TSM model as of Aug 21, 2026.

Horizon read

The stance changes by timeframe.

These are Formula stances by timeframe, not execution instructions. The full validation grid is below.

1 Day

8/100 conf

Hold

+0.2%

Risk brake 73/100 / News sentiment 62/100

7 Days

8/100 conf

Hold

+0.6%

Analyst/revision signal 82/100 / Risk brake 73/100

15 Days

8/100 conf

Hold

+1.4%

Analyst/revision signal 82/100 / Quality trend 88/100

30 Days

10/100 conf

Hold

+2.6%

Analyst/revision signal 82/100 / Quality trend 88/100

3 Months

10/100 conf

Hold

+4.6%

Quality trend 88/100 / Analyst/revision signal 82/100

6 Months

10/100 conf

Hold

+7.0%

Quality trend 88/100 / Analyst/revision signal 82/100

1 Year

13/100 conf

Hold

+11.3%

Quality trend 88/100 / Analyst/revision signal 82/100

3 Years

16/100 conf

Hold

+20.9%

Quality trend 88/100 / Analyst/revision signal 82/100

5 Years

16/100 conf

Hold

+31.3%

Quality trend 88/100 / Risk brake 73/100

10 Years

16/100 conf

Hold

+47.7%

Quality trend 88/100 / Risk brake 73/100

What moves it

Strongest inputs

Quality trend

88/100

2/9 inputs · 14% dashboard weight

Analyst/revision signal

82/100

1/5 inputs · 10% dashboard weight

Risk brake

73/100

3/8 inputs · 7% dashboard weight

Pressure points

Technical tape

50/100

0/16 inputs · 12% dashboard weight

Track record validation

50/100

0/8 inputs · 12% dashboard weight

Future value

50/100

0/7 inputs · 11% dashboard weight

Habit loop

Watch the next price trigger, not just the score.

TSM's nearest horizon is hold at +0.2%; use a dashboard price alert to catch the next break before the next Signal refresh.

Set price alert

Formula lab

Factor evidence, scenarios, horizons, and validation.

CompositeHorizonsValidation

Evidence lab

Balanced watch

Dashboard score

51

/100

1 day to 10 years + strategic setup

Low confidence

15 of 76 fields are powering the model.

History progress

Past returns in Signal

Scored windows

Long-range history isn't deep enough to score these windows yet.

7 empty progress windows are hidden until enough closes exist.

A-Z factor map

Available scoring inputs

11/26 factors

15 unscored inputs are hidden until the quote stack has verified fields for them.

Balance sheet

C

Cash runway

Balance sheet · 93/100

Current unavailable; cash/debt unavailable

Method

Checks liquidity, leverage, and balance-sheet room.

Data coverage

Z

Zero-missing risk

Data coverage · 52/100

32 missing fields

Method

Shows how much the model is relying on available fields versus placeholders.

External view

A

Analyst conviction

External view · 82/100

Consensus 4.26; upside unavailable; disagreement unavailable

Method

Uses consensus, target spread, target disagreement, revisions, and latest EPS surprise.

Forecast

U

Upside scenarios

Forecast · 73/100

Future 50/100; analyst 82/100

Method

Combines TECHi future-value signal with outside target support.

Quality

K

Key margins

Quality · 100/100

Gross unavailable; operating unavailable

Method

Rewards margin breadth before assigning quality confidence.

Q

Quality trend

Quality · 88/100

Quality composite 88/100

Method

Combines margins, returns, growth, and cash conversion.

Sentiment

N

News tone

Sentiment · 62/100

4 headlines; bullish

Method

Headline breadth and sentiment are capped so news does not overpower data.

Strategic

L

Leadership depth

Strategic · 65/100

1 named executives

Method

Adds C-suite coverage for execution visibility.

S

Social/developer

Strategic · 50/100

Social composite 50/100

Method

Uses verified public channels and developer gravity when available.

Technicals

T

Technical tape

Technicals · 50/100

20D unavailable; ATR unavailable; %B unavailable

Method

Blends returns, SMA/EMA crosses (unavailable), RSI, MACD, Stochastic, Bollinger Bands, ATR, volume, volatility, and drawdown.

Valuation

P

PE and PEG

Valuation · 75/100

Forward PE 24.1x; PEG 1.1x; EV/Sales unavailable

Method

Penalizes expensive multiples unless growth support is visible.

Composite formula

Composite = normalized weighted sum (14% quality trend, 12% technical tape, 12% momentum, 12% track record validation, 11% future value, 10% valuation, 10% analyst/revision, 7% risk brake, 6% news sentiment, 4% leadership, 2% social/developer traction), confidence-adjusted toward neutral by input coverage^0.7 x freshness factor x missing-critical-field penalty x analyst-disagreement penalty

Strategic inputs

0 roadmap items, 1 leadership roles, 0 social/developer channels, human-impact lens unavailable.

Factual coverage

43/100 from 37/69 sourced fields, 14% live source health, and 32 missing fields.

Accuracy trail

Accuracy tracking needs a longer scored history before this model reports a hit rate — coverage and confidence are shown without a prediction-accuracy claim.

Guardrail

Buy/Hold/Sell labels are research stances. Predictive accuracy is shown beside the model and should be read with filings, risk tolerance, and current market conditions.

Bull case

+21.1%

$507.39

Momentum holds, quality signals stay firm, future-product execution improves, and valuation pressure does not widen.

Base case

+10.1%

$461.30

Weighted factor model using price, fundamentals, analyst, sentiment, roadmap, leadership, social traction, and risk inputs.

Stress case

-0.9%

$415.22

Volatility, missing-data, valuation, and balance-sheet brakes are applied to the setup.

Horizon model

Horizon matrix

Timeframe-specific weights: trading windows lean on tape; investor windows lean on quality, valuation, and revisions; strategic windows lean on future value.

Trading windows

1-30 day tape, momentum, and event risk.

1 Day

55/100 signal · 8/100 conf · 43/100 facts

Hold

+0.2%

$419.79

Drivers Risk brake 73/100 · News sentiment 62/100

7 Days

58/100 signal · 8/100 conf · 43/100 facts

Hold

+0.6%

$421.46

Drivers Analyst/revision signal 82/100 · Risk brake 73/100

15 Days

62/100 signal · 8/100 conf · 43/100 facts

Hold

+1.4%

$424.82

Drivers Analyst/revision signal 82/100 · Quality trend 88/100

30 Days

65/100 signal · 10/100 conf · 43/100 facts

Hold

+2.6%

$429.84

Drivers Analyst/revision signal 82/100 · Quality trend 88/100

Investor windows

Quarterly setup through one-year thesis checks.

3 Months

67/100 signal · 10/100 conf · 43/100 facts

Hold

+4.6%

$438.22

Drivers Quality trend 88/100 · Analyst/revision signal 82/100

6 Months

68/100 signal · 10/100 conf · 43/100 facts

Hold

+7.0%

$448.28

Drivers Quality trend 88/100 · Analyst/revision signal 82/100

1 Year

68/100 signal · 13/100 conf · 43/100 facts

Hold

+11.3%

$466.29

Drivers Quality trend 88/100 · Analyst/revision signal 82/100

Strategic windows

Multi-year durability, leadership, and future value.

3 Years

68/100 signal · 16/100 conf · 43/100 facts

Hold

+20.9%

$506.51

Drivers Quality trend 88/100 · Analyst/revision signal 82/100

5 Years

68/100 signal · 16/100 conf · 43/100 facts

Hold

+31.3%

$550.08

Drivers Quality trend 88/100 · Risk brake 73/100

10 Years

69/100 signal · 16/100 conf · 43/100 facts

Hold

+47.7%

$618.79

Drivers Quality trend 88/100 · Risk brake 73/100

Price-direction backtest

Daily scoring history

Tests whether the model's price-derived direction matched later closes — it does not yet validate the fundamental, analyst, or sentiment factors, which need persisted daily history. Longer and multi-year horizons score once enough closes have matured.

Daily scoring history appears once enough closes have accumulated.

10 horizon lanes are hidden until enough future closes mature.

11 validations appear once TECHi has tracked enough daily factor history for them.

Frequently asked

Common questions.

What is TECHi Signal for TSM?

TECHi Signal combines available technical, valuation, fundamental, analyst, sentiment, catalyst, and risk inputs for Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) into an explainable research stance.

Is TECHi Signal investment advice?

No. Signal labels are research context, not personalized investment advice or an order recommendation.

How is Signal different from Forecast for TSM?

Forecast focuses on analyst targets and scenarios. Signal combines that evidence with technical, fundamental, sentiment, catalyst, and risk inputs.