Skip to main content
Methodology published · Market data, model notes, and corrections process are public · Data policy · Corrections policy
C logo

NYSE · FINANCIAL SERVICES · TECHi Signal

Citigroup Inc. (C) Stock Signal

Positive but selective. Valuation pressure (83/100) drives the read while news sentiment (17/100) is the main constraint. Inputs: 60/68 fields (88%), confidence 79/100.

Start here

C: Positive but selective

Positive but selective. Inputs 60/68 (88%), confidence 79/100. It ranks #11/120 across fresh TECHi snapshots and #1/1 in Financial Services. Use Formula lab when you need the full evidence trail.

Signal

61/100

High confidence

Inputs

60/68

84/100 factual coverage

Universe

#11/120

92/100 snapshot percentile

Nearest

Hold

1 Day +1.1%

Formula signalHigh confidence60/68 inputs

Positive but selective

Positive but selective. Inputs 60/68 (88%), confidence 79/100. It ranks #11/120 across fresh TECHi snapshots and #1/1 in Financial Services. Use Formula lab for full math and assumptions.

Technical tape

68/100

12% wt

Uses the live quote and the shared one-year chart to score trend, stretch, confirmation, and risk.

10/11 inputs available

Forecast layer

70/100

10% wt

Blends outside target data, surprise history, and whether estimates are moving up or down.

4/4 inputs available

Valuation

83/100

10% wt

Higher score means the current multiple has more room relative to growth and targets.

8/8 inputs available

Risk brake

55/100

7% wt

Penalizes volatility, leverage, weak liquidity, thin history, sparse provider coverage, and recent drawdowns.

8/8 inputs available

61

Signal score

Active horizon

1 day to 10 years + strategic setup

84/100 factual coverage, 52% live-feed health.

Neon snapshot universe

C against fresh TECHi coverage.

Peer ranks are recalculated from fresh quote snapshots using a bounded scalar score, so the context moves when the underlying data moves without slowing the page.

Universe rank

#11/120

92/100 percentile among scored fresh snapshots.

Sector rank

#1/1

Financial Services coverage cohort.

Fresh symbols

120

120 Neon rows read in the 7-day window.

Freshest pull

Jun 13, 2026

C model as of Jun 12, 2026.

Horizon read

The stance changes by timeframe.

These are Formula stances by timeframe, not execution instructions. The full validation grid is below.

1 Day

79/100 conf

Hold

+1.1%

Technical tape 68/100 / News sentiment 17/100

7 Days

79/100 conf

Hold

+1.9%

Technical tape 68/100 / News sentiment 17/100

15 Days

79/100 conf

Hold

+4.0%

Technical tape 68/100 / News sentiment 17/100

30 Days

80/100 conf

Hold

+6.5%

Valuation pressure 83/100 / Analyst/revision signal 70/100

3 Months

80/100 conf

Hold

+9.4%

Valuation pressure 83/100 / Analyst/revision signal 70/100

6 Months

80/100 conf

Hold

+13.5%

Valuation pressure 83/100 / Quality trend 72/100

1 Year

80/100 conf

Hold

+21.9%

Valuation pressure 83/100 / Quality trend 72/100

3 Years

80/100 conf

Hold

+34.7%

Quality trend 72/100 / Valuation pressure 83/100

5 Years

80/100 conf

Hold

+47.7%

Quality trend 72/100 / Valuation pressure 83/100

10 Years

80/100 conf

Hold

+68.9%

Quality trend 72/100 / Valuation pressure 83/100

What moves it

Strongest inputs

Valuation pressure

83/100

Higher score means the current multiple has more room relative to growth and targets.

Track record validation

73/100

Checks whether the stock has repeatedly converted setups into later closes, not just one live snapshot.

Quality trend

72/100

Looks for a business that can convert growth into durable profit, cash flow, and returns.

Pressure points

News sentiment

17/100

Captures current narrative pressure without letting headlines dominate the model.

Future value

42/100

Adds a strategic lens for upcoming products, real-world usefulness, growth support, and balance-sheet runway.

Leadership depth

50/100

Rewards leadership visibility across finance, operations, technology, product, and go-to-market roles.

Habit loop

Watch the next price trigger, not just the score.

C's nearest horizon is hold at +1.1%; use a dashboard price alert to catch the next break before the next Signal refresh.

Set price alert

Source layers

Signal is built from the quote stack, not a single widget.

Jump to the underlying pages when you want to inspect the raw inputs behind the Formula score.

Formula lab

Full score, factors, horizons, scenarios, and validation.

CompositeHorizonsValidation

TECHi Signal

Positive but selective

Valuation pressure 83/100 is the strongest signal. News sentiment 17/100 is the main constraint. Inputs 60/68 (88%), confidence 79/100.

61

/100

1 day to 10 years + strategic setup

High confidence

60 of 68 fields are powering the model.

History progress

Past returns feeding Signal

20Y to 1D

20 Years

40/100

-56.4%

-4.1% CAGR

$321.06 to $139.83

2006-06-12 to 2026-06-12

20-year progress favors archived CAGR context when tape-only windows are incomplete.

10 Years

89/100

+330.1%

+15.7% CAGR

$32.51 to $139.83

2016-06-10 to 2026-06-12

10-year progress tracks decade-scale compounding structure when enough closes exist.

5 Years

89/100

+117.4%

+16.8% CAGR

$64.33 to $139.83

2021-06-11 to 2026-06-12

5-year progress prioritizes compounding behavior to make strategic drift visible.

1 Year

100/100

+82.8%

+82.8% CAGR

$76.51 to $139.83

2025-06-12 to 2026-06-12

1-year progress blends current return with annualized context for cleaner long-cycle comparison.

Last month

80/100

+12.7%

CAGR unavailable

$124.10 to $139.83

2026-05-13 to 2026-06-12

1-month progress reflects recent tape with less sensitivity than daily windows.

Last week

70/100

+5.6%

CAGR unavailable

$132.47 to $139.83

2026-06-05 to 2026-06-12

1-week progress tracks short-cycle tape and can rotate meaningfully with each close cluster.

Yesterday

58/100

+1.3%

CAGR unavailable

$138.07 to $139.83

2026-06-11 to 2026-06-12

1-day progress tracks latest close-to-close momentum from tape.

Factor map by category

Available scoring inputs

24/26 factors

2 unscored inputs are hidden until the quote stack has verified fields for them.

Balance sheet

C

Cash runway

Balance sheet · 9/100

Current 0.05x; cash/debt 0.49x

Checks liquidity, leverage, and balance-sheet room.

Data coverage

Z

Zero-missing risk

Data coverage · 51/100

12 missing fields

Shows how much the model is relying on available fields versus placeholders.

External view

A

Analyst conviction

External view · 70/100

Consensus 4.05; upside +5.1%

Uses consensus, target spread, revisions, and latest EPS surprise.

I

Implied upside

External view · 57/100

Target spread +5.1%

Measures analyst target room versus the latest quote.

Forecast

U

Upside scenarios

Forecast · 61/100

Future 42/100; analyst 70/100

Combines internal future-value signal with outside target support.

Fundamental proof

E

Earnings accuracy

Fundamental proof · 78/100

Positive EPS surprise rate 78/100

Grades whether reported earnings have beaten estimates when history is available.

Growth

G

Growth pulse

Growth · 67/100

Revenue +15.9%; EPS +56.1%

Compares latest YoY sales and earnings momentum.

Y

Year-over-year proof

Growth · 74/100

1M windows 70/100; 3M windows 90/100

Looks for repeated conversion from past setups into later closes.

Momentum

J

Jump signal

Momentum · 65/100

5D return +5.6%

Captures the newest short-term price impulse.

W

52-week position

Momentum · 73/100

Range position +98.1%

Scores trend strength while trimming crowded highs.

Quality

F

Free cash flow

Quality · 100/100

FCF margin +31.7%; yield +10.6%

Connects profit quality to cash generation and market value.

K

Key margins

Quality · 89/100

Gross +100%; operating +34.1%

Rewards margin breadth before assigning quality confidence.

O

Operating leverage

Quality · 100/100

Operating margin +34.1%

Shows whether revenue is converting into operating profit.

Q

Quality trend

Quality · 72/100

Quality composite 72/100

Combines margins, returns, growth, and cash conversion.

Risk

B

Beta risk

Risk · 88/100

Beta 1.115

Lower and steadier beta earns a stronger risk-adjusted score.

Sentiment

N

News tone

Sentiment · 17/100

2 headlines; unavailable

Headline breadth and sentiment are capped so news does not overpower data.

Strategic

L

Leadership depth

Strategic · 50/100

0 named executives

Adds C-suite coverage for execution visibility.

S

Social/developer

Strategic · 50/100

Social composite 50/100

Uses verified public channels and developer gravity when available.

Technical risk

D

Drawdown control

Technical risk · 62/100

90D max drawdown -14.8%

Scores whether recent losses stayed controlled versus the latest peak.

Technicals

M

MACD pressure

Technicals · 89/100

MACD histogram 1.05

Reads whether trend momentum is accelerating or fading.

R

RSI balance

Technicals · 42/100

RSI 14 74.7

Rewards constructive momentum without extreme overbought stretch.

T

Technical tape

Technicals · 68/100

20D +12%; 60D +29.3%

Blends returns, averages, RSI, MACD, volume, volatility, and drawdown.

Validation

H

History depth

Validation · 100/100

6694 closes analyzed

More closes improve backtest coverage and reduce thin-history risk.

Valuation

P

PE and PEG

Valuation · 82/100

Forward PE 12.52x; PEG 0.74x; EV/Sales 7.1x

Penalizes expensive multiples unless growth support is visible.

Composite formula

Composite = 14% quality trend, 12% technical tape, 12% momentum, 12% track-record validation, 11% future value, 10% valuation, 10% analyst/revision, 7% risk brake, 6% news sentiment, 4% leadership, 2% social/developer traction, confidence-adjusted for input completeness and missing critical fields

Strategic inputs

0 roadmap items, 0 leadership roles, 0 social/developer channels, human-impact lens unavailable.

Factual coverage

84/100 from 101/113 sourced fields, 52% live feed health, and 12 missing fields.

Accuracy trail

12.5% rolling hit rate across 1078 matured horizon scores. Accuracy is a rolling price-history proxy from available closes. Full field-by-field correctness requires storing daily factor snapshots and grading them after each horizon matures.

Guardrail

Buy/Hold/Sell labels are research stances. Predictive accuracy is shown beside the model and should be read with filings, risk tolerance, and current market conditions.

Bull case

+18.9%

$166.24

Momentum holds, quality signals stay firm, future-product execution improves, and valuation pressure does not widen.

Base case

+9.1%

$152.59

Weighted factor model using price, fundamentals, analyst, sentiment, roadmap, leadership, social traction, and risk inputs.

Stress case

+0.2%

$140.12

Volatility, missing-data, valuation, and balance-sheet brakes are applied to the setup.

Horizon model

Buy, hold, or sell research stance by timeframe

Each row changes the formula weights: short windows lean on technicals and tape; long windows lean on quality, valuation, leadership, and future value.

Trading windows

1-30 day tape, momentum, and event risk.

1 Day

61/100 signal · 79/100 conf · 84/100 facts

14.2% hit · 219 scored

Hold

+1.1%

$141.39

Basis 50% technical tape + 20% momentum + 12% news sentiment + 10% risk brake + 8% analyst/revision. Technical tape 68/100 · News sentiment 17/100 · Momentum setup 67/100. Intraday-sensitive. Treat as tape risk, not a forecast.

7 Days

60/100 signal · 79/100 conf · 84/100 facts

9.9% hit · 213 scored

Hold

+1.9%

$142.51

Basis 41% technical tape + 25% momentum + 13% news sentiment + 11% analyst/revision + 10% risk brake. Technical tape 68/100 · News sentiment 17/100 · Momentum setup 67/100. One-week setup. News and technical reversals can dominate fundamentals.

15 Days

64/100 signal · 79/100 conf · 84/100 facts

11.2% hit · 205 scored

Hold

+4.0%

$145.44

Basis 30% technical tape + 21% momentum + 14% analyst/revision + 12% news sentiment + 11% quality trend + 8% valuation + 8% track-record validation + 6% risk brake. Technical tape 68/100 · News sentiment 17/100 · Momentum setup 67/100. Short swing setup. Earnings dates and macro prints can overwhelm the model.

30 Days

65/100 signal · 80/100 conf · 84/100 facts

21.6% hit · 190 scored

Hold

+6.5%

$148.94

Basis 22% technical tape + 20% analyst/revision + 18% momentum + 13% valuation + 12% quality trend + 10% news sentiment + 10% risk brake + 5% track-record validation. Valuation pressure 83/100 · Analyst/revision signal 70/100 · Technical tape 68/100. One-month setup. Best read with earnings calendar and options positioning.

Investor windows

Quarterly setup through one-year thesis checks.

3 Months

64/100 signal · 80/100 conf · 84/100 facts

12.1% hit · 157 scored

Hold

+9.4%

$153.00

Basis 20% analyst/revision + 18% quality trend + 16% valuation + 14% technical tape + 14% future value + 13% momentum + 8% risk brake + 7% news sentiment + 0% track-record validation. Valuation pressure 83/100 · Analyst/revision signal 70/100 · Quality trend 72/100. Quarterly setup. Guidance, margin trend, and estimate revisions matter most.

6 Months

64/100 signal · 80/100 conf · 84/100 facts

0.0% hit · 94 scored

Hold

+13.5%

$158.73

Basis 24% quality trend + 18% analyst/revision + 18% valuation + 16% future value + 10% momentum + 8% technical tape + 7% news sentiment + 7% risk brake + 2% track-record validation. Valuation pressure 83/100 · Quality trend 72/100 · Analyst/revision signal 70/100. Two-quarter setup. Watch estimate revisions and balance-sheet risk.

1 Year

64/100 signal · 80/100 conf · 84/100 facts

Unavailable hit · 0 scored

Hold

+21.9%

$170.48

Basis 24% quality trend + 18% analyst/revision + 18% valuation + 16% future value + 8% momentum + 8% technical tape + 6% leadership + 5% news sentiment + 5% risk brake + 2% track-record validation. Valuation pressure 83/100 · Quality trend 72/100 · Analyst/revision signal 70/100. Twelve-month research signal. Compare with analyst targets and filings.

Strategic windows

Multi-year durability, leadership, and future value.

3 Years

62/100 signal · 80/100 conf · 84/100 facts

Unavailable hit · 0 scored

Hold

+34.7%

$188.38

Basis 30% quality trend + 24% future value + 15% valuation + 10% leadership + 10% analyst/revision + 7% risk brake + 5% track-record validation + 5% social/developer traction + 2% momentum + 2% news sentiment. Quality trend 72/100 · Valuation pressure 83/100 · Analyst/revision signal 70/100. Multi-year thesis signal. Execution quality matters more than current tape.

5 Years

61/100 signal · 80/100 conf · 84/100 facts

Unavailable hit · 0 scored

Hold

+47.7%

$206.56

Basis 31% quality trend + 24% future value + 15% valuation + 10% leadership + 10% risk brake + 6% analyst/revision + 5% track-record validation + 4% momentum + 3% news sentiment + 2% social/developer traction. Quality trend 72/100 · Valuation pressure 83/100 · Future value 42/100. Long-term compounding signal. Needs repeated validation after each filing cycle.

10 Years

61/100 signal · 80/100 conf · 84/100 facts

Unavailable hit · 0 scored

Hold

+68.9%

$236.21

Basis 35% quality trend + 25% future value + 12% leadership + 12% valuation + 9% risk brake + 5% analyst/revision + 5% track-record validation + 3% social/developer traction + 2% momentum + 2% news sentiment. Quality trend 72/100 · Valuation pressure 83/100 · Future value 42/100. Decade thesis signal. This is strategic durability, not a price target.

Model validation

Daily scoring history by horizon and field

The 1-day model is rescored for every available close. Longer horizons are scored when enough future sessions have matured; strategic factors stay limited until daily snapshots are stored.

1 Day

14.2%

Scored

219 daily scores · 1.4% avg error

Latest: Hold +0.8% vs +1.3% actual

7 Days

9.9%

Scored

213 daily scores · 3.5% avg error

Latest: Hold +1.4% vs +7.6% actual

15 Days

11.2%

Scored

205 daily scores · 5.5% avg error

Latest: Hold +1.1% vs +11.7% actual

30 Days

21.6%

Scored

190 daily scores · 7.3% avg error

Latest: Hold +1.7% vs +9.8% actual

3 Months

12.1%

Scored

157 daily scores · 11.0% avg error

Latest: Hold +0.6% vs +32.9% actual

6 Months

0.0%

Scored

94 daily scores · 21.4% avg error

Latest: Hold +2.5% vs +27.1% actual

1 Year

Unavailable

Not scored

0 daily scores · avg error unavailable

Latest: waiting for matured closes

3 Years

Unavailable

Not scored

0 daily scores · avg error unavailable

Latest: waiting for matured closes

5 Years

Unavailable

Not scored

0 daily scores · avg error unavailable

Latest: waiting for matured closes

10 Years

Unavailable

Not scored

0 daily scores · avg error unavailable

Latest: waiting for matured closes

7 validation lanes need daily factor snapshots before TECHi shows historical accuracy for them.

Technical tape

Scored

12.1%

432 samples · latest 2026-06-11

Validated daily from historical price tape: SMA, RSI, MACD, volatility, drawdown, and short returns.

Momentum setup

Scored

14.0%

608 samples · latest 2026-06-03

Validated from rolling forward returns after trend and range-position signals.

Track record validation

Scored

17.3%

347 samples · latest 2026-04-30

Validated from recurring positive-return windows, long-run CAGR, and earnings-surprise evidence where available.

Risk brake

Scored

15.0%

552 samples · latest 2026-05-21

Validated as a price-history proxy: volatility, drawdown, and risk brakes are checked against later downside/upside behavior.

Technical tape

5D/20D/60D returns + SMA 20/50/200 + RSI 14 + MACD + volume + volatility

12%

68/100

Uses the live quote and the shared one-year chart to score trend, stretch, confirmation, and risk.

10/11 inputs available

Momentum setup

Range position + price vs averages + session move + 20D/60D returns + liquidity multiple

12%

67/100

Rewards confirmed trend, but trims extremes near the top of the range.

7/8 inputs available

Track record validation

All-time CAGR + one-year positive windows + EPS surprise hit rate + distance from all-time high + listing depth

12%

73/100

Checks whether the stock has repeatedly converted setups into later closes, not just one live snapshot.

8/8 inputs available

Quality trend

Margins + ROE/ROA + revenue growth + earnings growth + free-cash-flow conversion

14%

72/100

Looks for a business that can convert growth into durable profit, cash flow, and returns.

9/9 inputs available

Future value

Product roadmap + human impact + forward growth estimates + capital runway

11%

42/100

Adds a strategic lens for upcoming products, real-world usefulness, growth support, and balance-sheet runway.

5/7 inputs available

Valuation pressure

Forward/trailing multiple + price/sales + price/book + EV/sales + PEG + FCF yield + target spread

10%

83/100

Higher score means the current multiple has more room relative to growth and targets.

8/8 inputs available

Analyst/revision signal

Consensus score + implied upside + latest EPS surprise + EPS estimate revisions

10%

70/100

Blends outside target data, surprise history, and whether estimates are moving up or down.

4/4 inputs available

News sentiment

Average news sentiment score + dominant label + current headline breadth

6%

17/100

Captures current narrative pressure without letting headlines dominate the model.

1/3 inputs available

Leadership depth

CEO + CFO/COO/CTO/CPO/CMO coverage + named executive depth

4%

50/100

Rewards leadership visibility across finance, operations, technology, product, and go-to-market roles.

0/1 inputs available

Social/developer traction

X/Twitter + GitHub + LinkedIn + YouTube + other public audience signals

2%

50/100

Captures community and developer gravity where verified handles or follower snapshots are available.

0/1 inputs available

Risk brake

Beta + leverage + liquidity + size + volatility + drawdown + history + missing fields

7%

55/100

Penalizes volatility, leverage, weak liquidity, thin history, sparse provider coverage, and recent drawdowns.

8/8 inputs available

Composite = 14% quality trend, 12% technical tape, 12% momentum, 12% track-record validation, 11% future value, 10% valuation, 10% analyst/revision, 7% risk brake, 6% news sentiment, 4% leadership, 2% social/developer traction, confidence-adjusted for input completeness and missing critical fields

Scenario prices blend live market fields with roadmap, leadership, human-impact, and social/developer inputs; they are not analyst price targets.

Buy/Hold/Sell is the formula label for the selected horizon, not personal financial advice. Use it beside filings, risk tolerance, and current market conditions.

0 roadmap inputs in the future-value lens.

0 named C-suite roles tracked.

0 social and developer channels available.

Frequently asked

Common questions.

What is TECHi Signal for C?

TECHi Signal is the Formula scoring layer for Citigroup Inc. (C). It blends technical tape, momentum, valuation, fundamentals, analyst revisions, sentiment, leadership, traction, and risk into an explainable research stance.

Is TECHi Signal a buy or sell recommendation?

No. Signal labels are research stances, not personalized financial advice. They show which inputs are constructive, balanced, watch-list, or risk-heavy so readers can decide what to research next.

How do technicals affect C's Signal?

Technicals feed the Formula model through trend, momentum, RSI/MACD, moving averages, volume, volatility, and drawdown inputs. Short horizons weight technicals more heavily than long horizons.

How is Signal different from Forecast for C?

Forecast focuses on analyst targets, ratings, estimates, and scenario math. Signal is TECHi's broader cross-signal model that combines Forecast data with technicals, valuation, fundamentals, catalysts, sentiment, and risk.