NASDAQ · FINANCIAL SERVICES · TECHi Signal
Terawulf Inc (WULF) Stock Rating & Risk Score
TECHi Signal compresses current quote, fundamental, technical, analyst, and strategic inputs into one explainable research stance for WULF.
Start here
WULF: Balanced watch
Balanced watch. Track record validation (76/100) is the strongest signal; quality trend (27/100) is the main constraint. Model confidence is 34/100 from 65 of 76 available inputs and a 78% freshness factor; 11 inputs are missing, so treat this as a directional research screen rather than a forecast. Analyst disagreement penalty is applied through the confidence model; the Analyst View card owns the published spread. Long-term secular context is tracked separately: 1 Year +238.8% total (100/100 progress score); yesterday +1%. Rolling price-history validation is 6.8% across 1078 matured horizon scores; full field-by-field accuracy still needs stored daily snapshots. It ranks #106/121 across the TECHi coverage universe and #1/1 in Financial Services. Use the top read for speed, then inspect the Formula lab when you need the full evidence trail.
Signal
48/100
Low confidence
Inputs
65/76
81/100 factual coverage
Universe
#106/121
13/100 peer percentile
Nearest
Hold
1 Day -0.9%
Balanced watch
Dashboard view for the current Signal score, confidence, input coverage, and active horizon. The full narrative read lives in Start Here; the evidence trail is consolidated below.
Technical tape
31/100
16/16 inputs
Forecast layer
58/100
4/5 inputs
Valuation
29/100
6/8 inputs
Risk brake
42/100
7/8 inputs
48
Signal score
Active horizon
1 day to 10 years + strategic setup
81/100 factual coverage, 51% live source health.
TECHi coverage universe
WULF against fresh TECHi coverage.
Peer ranks are recalculated from the latest live quotes, so the context moves when the underlying data moves.
Universe rank
#106/121
13/100 percentile among scored peers.
Sector rank
#1/1
Financial Services coverage cohort.
Fresh symbols
121
120 tickers scored in the trailing week.
Freshest pull
Jul 18, 2026
WULF model as of Jul 17, 2026.
Horizon read
The stance changes by timeframe.
These are Formula stances by timeframe, not execution instructions. The full validation grid is below.
1 Day
20/100 conf
-0.9%
Technical tape 31/100 / Momentum setup 40/100
7 Days
20/100 conf
-1.4%
Technical tape 31/100 / Momentum setup 40/100
15 Days
20/100 conf
-1.9%
Technical tape 31/100 / Quality trend 27/100
30 Days
23/100 conf
-2.8%
Technical tape 31/100 / Quality trend 27/100
3 Months
23/100 conf
-4.9%
Quality trend 27/100 / Valuation pressure 29/100
6 Months
23/100 conf
-7.0%
Quality trend 27/100 / Valuation pressure 29/100
1 Year
25/100 conf
-11.4%
Quality trend 27/100 / Valuation pressure 29/100
3 Years
27/100 conf
-21.1%
Quality trend 27/100 / Valuation pressure 29/100
5 Years
27/100 conf
-31.6%
Quality trend 27/100 / Valuation pressure 29/100
10 Years
27/100 conf
-51.4%
Quality trend 27/100 / Valuation pressure 29/100
What moves it
Strongest inputs
Track record validation
76/100
7/8 inputs · 12% dashboard weight
News sentiment
67/100
1/3 inputs · 6% dashboard weight
Analyst/revision signal
58/100
4/5 inputs · 10% dashboard weight
Pressure points
Quality trend
27/100
9/9 inputs · 14% dashboard weight
Valuation pressure
29/100
6/8 inputs · 10% dashboard weight
Technical tape
31/100
16/16 inputs · 12% dashboard weight
Habit loop
Watch the next price trigger, not just the score.
WULF's nearest horizon is hold at -0.9%; use a dashboard price alert to catch the next break before the next Signal refresh.
Formula lab
Factor evidence, scenarios, horizons, and validation.
Evidence lab
Balanced watch
Dashboard score
48
/100
1 day to 10 years + strategic setup
Low confidence
65 of 76 fields are powering the model.
History progress
Past returns in Signal
Scored windows
20 Years
65/100+230.1%
+6.2% CAGR
$5.50 to $18.16
2006-07-18 to 2026-07-17
20-year progress favors long-run compounding context when full daily history is incomplete.
10 Years
65/100+76.0%
+5.8% CAGR
$10.32 to $18.16
2016-07-15 to 2026-07-17
10-year progress tracks decade-scale compounding structure when enough closes exist.
5 Years
55/100+10.8%
+2.1% CAGR
$16.39 to $18.16
2021-07-16 to 2026-07-17
5-year progress prioritizes compounding behavior to make strategic drift visible.
1 Year
100/100+238.8%
+239.1% CAGR
$5.36 to $18.16
2025-07-17 to 2026-07-17
1-year progress blends current return with annualized context for cleaner long-cycle comparison.
Last month
0/100-35.2%
CAGR unavailable
$28.01 to $18.16
2026-06-16 to 2026-07-17
1-month progress reflects recent tape with less sensitivity than daily windows.
Last week
0/100-17.3%
CAGR unavailable
$21.97 to $18.16
2026-07-10 to 2026-07-17
1-week progress tracks short-cycle tape and can rotate meaningfully with each close cluster.
Yesterday
56/100+1.0%
CAGR unavailable
$17.98 to $18.16
2026-07-16 to 2026-07-17
1-day progress tracks latest close-to-close momentum from tape.
A-Z factor map
Available scoring inputs
24/26 factors
2 unscored inputs are hidden until the quote stack has verified fields for them.
Balance sheet
Cash runway
Balance sheet · 45/100
Current 1.2x; cash/debt 0.63x
Method
Checks liquidity, leverage, and balance-sheet room.
Data coverage
Zero-missing risk
Data coverage · 46/100
11 missing fields
Method
Shows how much the model is relying on available fields versus placeholders.
External view
Analyst conviction
External view · 58/100
Consensus 4.26; upside +112.5%; disagreement +231.3%
Method
Uses consensus, target spread, target disagreement, revisions, and latest EPS surprise.
Implied upside
External view · 100/100
Target move +112.5%; disagreement +231.3%
Method
Measures analyst target room versus the latest quote and flags wide high-low target dispersion.
Forecast
Upside scenarios
Forecast · 45/100
Future 50/100; analyst 58/100
Method
Combines TECHi future-value signal with outside target support.
Growth
Growth pulse
Growth · 29/100
Revenue -1.1%; EPS 0%
Method
Compares latest YoY sales and earnings momentum.
Year-over-year proof
Growth · 55/100
1M windows 73/100; 3M windows 86/100
Method
Looks for repeated conversion from past setups into later closes.
Momentum
Jump signal
Momentum · 3/100
5D return -17.3%
Method
Captures the newest short-term price impulse.
52-week position
Momentum · 73/100
Range position +53.7%
Method
Scores trend strength while trimming crowded highs.
Quality
Free cash flow
Quality · 22/100
FCF margin -321.6%; yield -4.7%
Method
Connects profit quality to cash generation and market value.
Key margins
Quality · 41/100
Gross +64%; operating -3.7%
Method
Rewards margin breadth before assigning quality confidence.
Operating leverage
Quality · 11/100
Operating margin -3.7%
Method
Shows whether revenue is converting into operating profit.
Quality trend
Quality · 27/100
Quality composite 27/100
Method
Combines margins, returns, growth, and cash conversion.
Risk
Beta risk
Risk · 8/100
Beta 4.261
Method
Lower and steadier beta earns a stronger risk-adjusted score.
Sentiment
News tone
Sentiment · 67/100
8 headlines; unavailable
Method
Headline breadth and sentiment are capped so news does not overpower data.
Strategic
Leadership depth
Strategic · 50/100
0 named executives
Method
Adds C-suite coverage for execution visibility.
Social/developer
Strategic · 50/100
Social composite 50/100
Method
Uses verified public channels and developer gravity when available.
Technical risk
Drawdown control
Technical risk · 12/100
90D max drawdown -38%
Method
Scores whether recent losses stayed controlled versus the latest peak.
Technicals
MACD pressure
Technicals · 24/100
MACD hist -0.67; slope 0.02
Method
Reads MACD line pressure against its signal line plus histogram direction.
RSI balance
Technicals · 46/100
RSI 14 33.4; Stoch %K 15.8
Method
Rewards constructive oscillator momentum without extreme overbought stretch.
Technical tape
Technicals · 31/100
20D -34.8%; ATR 12%; %B 0.12
Method
Blends returns, SMA/EMA crosses (above), RSI, MACD, Stochastic, Bollinger Bands, ATR, volume, volatility, and drawdown.
Volume confirmation
Technicals · 54/100
Volume 36.5M vs avg 34M
Method
Checks whether price movement is confirmed by trading activity.
Validation
History depth
Validation · 100/100
5031 closes analyzed
Method
More closes improve backtest coverage and reduce thin-history risk.
Valuation
PE and PEG
Valuation · 32/100
Forward PE 29.76x; PEG unavailable; EV/Sales 77.57x
Method
Penalizes expensive multiples unless growth support is visible.
Composite formula
Composite = normalized weighted sum (14% quality trend, 12% technical tape, 12% momentum, 12% track record validation, 11% future value, 10% valuation, 10% analyst/revision, 7% risk brake, 6% news sentiment, 4% leadership, 2% social/developer traction), confidence-adjusted toward neutral by input coverage^0.7 x freshness factor x missing-critical-field penalty x analyst-disagreement penalty
Strategic inputs
0 roadmap items, 0 leadership roles, 0 social/developer channels, human-impact lens unavailable.
Factual coverage
81/100 from 93/104 sourced fields, 51% live source health, and 11 missing fields.
Accuracy trail
6.8% rolling hit rate across 1078 matured horizon scores. Accuracy is a rolling price-history proxy from available closes. Full field-by-field correctness requires storing daily factor snapshots and grading them after each horizon matures.
Guardrail
Buy/Hold/Sell labels are research stances. Predictive accuracy is shown beside the model and should be read with filings, risk tolerance, and current market conditions.
Bull case
+17.1%$21.26
Momentum holds, quality signals stay firm, future-product execution improves, and valuation pressure does not widen.
Base case
-4.9%$17.27
Weighted factor model using price, fundamentals, analyst, sentiment, roadmap, leadership, social traction, and risk inputs.
Stress case
-28.5%$12.99
Volatility, missing-data, valuation, and balance-sheet brakes are applied to the setup.
Horizon model
Horizon matrix
Timeframe-specific weights: trading windows lean on tape; investor windows lean on quality, valuation, and revisions; strategic windows lean on future value.
Trading windows
1-30 day tape, momentum, and event risk.
1 Day
40/100 signal · 20/100 conf · 81/100 facts
-0.9%
$18.00
Drivers Technical tape 31/100 · Momentum setup 40/100
7 Days
42/100 signal · 20/100 conf · 81/100 facts
-1.4%
$17.91
Drivers Technical tape 31/100 · Momentum setup 40/100
15 Days
43/100 signal · 20/100 conf · 81/100 facts
-1.9%
$17.81
Drivers Technical tape 31/100 · Quality trend 27/100
30 Days
43/100 signal · 23/100 conf · 81/100 facts
-2.8%
$17.65
Drivers Technical tape 31/100 · Quality trend 27/100
Investor windows
Quarterly setup through one-year thesis checks.
3 Months
42/100 signal · 23/100 conf · 81/100 facts
-4.9%
$17.27
Drivers Quality trend 27/100 · Valuation pressure 29/100
6 Months
42/100 signal · 23/100 conf · 81/100 facts
-7.0%
$16.89
Drivers Quality trend 27/100 · Valuation pressure 29/100
1 Year
42/100 signal · 25/100 conf · 81/100 facts
-11.4%
$16.09
Drivers Quality trend 27/100 · Valuation pressure 29/100
Strategic windows
Multi-year durability, leadership, and future value.
3 Years
42/100 signal · 27/100 conf · 81/100 facts
-21.1%
$14.33
Drivers Quality trend 27/100 · Valuation pressure 29/100
5 Years
42/100 signal · 27/100 conf · 81/100 facts
-31.6%
$12.42
Drivers Quality trend 27/100 · Valuation pressure 29/100
10 Years
41/100 signal · 27/100 conf · 81/100 facts
-51.4%
$8.83
Drivers Quality trend 27/100 · Valuation pressure 29/100
Price-direction backtest
Daily scoring history
Tests whether the model's price-derived direction matched later closes — it does not yet validate the fundamental, analyst, or sentiment factors, which need persisted daily history. Longer and multi-year horizons score once enough closes have matured.
1 Day
7.8%
219 daily scores · 4.5% avg error
Latest: Sell -1.2% vs +1.0% actual
7 Days
6.1%
213 daily scores · 11.6% avg error
Latest: Hold -0.5% vs -20.5% actual
15 Days
8.8%
205 daily scores · 15.0% avg error
Latest: Hold +0.9% vs -30.3% actual
30 Days
6.8%
190 daily scores · 20.4% avg error
Latest: Hold +2.1% vs -30.6% actual
3 Months
7.6%
157 daily scores · 34.3% avg error
Latest: Hold +1.6% vs -6.0% actual
6 Months
0.0%
94 daily scores · 64.5% avg error
Latest: Hold +1.0% vs +27.8% actual
4 horizon lanes are hidden until enough future closes mature.
7 validations appear once TECHi has tracked enough daily factor history for them.
Technical tape
Price-tested7.0%
432 samples · latest 2026-07-16
Validated daily from historical price tape: SMA, RSI, MACD, volatility, drawdown, and short returns.
Momentum setup
Price-tested7.2%
608 samples · latest 2026-07-08
Validated from rolling forward returns after trend and range-position signals.
Track record validation
Price-tested7.2%
347 samples · latest 2026-06-03
Validated from recurring positive-return windows, long-run CAGR, and earnings-surprise evidence where available.
Risk brake
Price-tested7.8%
552 samples · latest 2026-06-25
Validated as a price-history proxy: volatility, drawdown, and risk brakes are checked against later downside/upside behavior.
Frequently asked
Common questions.
What is TECHi Signal for WULF?
TECHi Signal is the Formula scoring layer for Terawulf Inc (WULF). It blends technical tape, momentum, valuation, fundamentals, analyst revisions, sentiment, leadership, traction, and risk into an explainable research stance.
Is TECHi Signal a buy or sell recommendation?
No. Signal labels are research stances, not personalized financial advice. They show which inputs are constructive, balanced, watch-list, or risk-heavy so readers can decide what to research next.
How do technicals affect WULF's Signal?
Technicals feed the Formula model through trend, momentum, RSI/MACD, moving averages, volume, volatility, and drawdown inputs. Short horizons weight technicals more heavily than long horizons.
How is Signal different from Forecast for WULF?
Forecast focuses on analyst targets, ratings, estimates, and scenario math. Signal is TECHi's broader cross-signal model that combines Forecast data with technicals, valuation, fundamentals, catalysts, sentiment, and risk.